From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Include ivy + counsel in Emacs core? Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:12:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20200913212657.va372qd2oeo3jds3@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14244"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: Andrea Corallo , "Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions." To: Ergus , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 14 13:13:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kHmQY-0003cC-L0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:13:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39212 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHmQX-0007En-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:13:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHmPY-0006Lq-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:12:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::633]:45989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHmPW-0006YI-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:12:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id i26so22617533ejb.12 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:12:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=0zIrjl0ZyOrh6cKPN15t7IMYm2MKdnzqp6rRW6mPTeY=; b=jCqGQFKCiQBxpTZHi6ua366U+mI5JRnfR8T6F5KrPb04Rt1HucI5duO/opR5zLr023 baNfHOsJfqyDYkRzaXnAPKrk7CYDiG55Lc7pteVHXw+qyjbOqA4wi1mWlJ6PlbUrjf8L V+Dc3Yp4DMH8s48lXo90qrpP63ttZTkZgMdHqwjyNdBLmWXvaDU8Po8AT1phiLDflfv4 frMWD1bCyUD8FVD3VS2mxvoKWZeXQ63j09HWiMisBUJfhTb8oW3VZb8MHKVFMcsH4wO/ /ju5sN7tR/EMIuTciVduvaXg1eUjq2p+5Vzf/19eNl4Y3Ru0h9UBb1nyirmkonmvZ77+ al+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=0zIrjl0ZyOrh6cKPN15t7IMYm2MKdnzqp6rRW6mPTeY=; b=FGBji052QPLE0tlW6sLvp7HmaWk18707zH7b/xMjNdB+y5y4ZOp4ycXVHXEhf6Q5gW VPM7Y/mhB/s3PiZ4o0Hp7p4qIudqjvjgpLNDJ6vn/aUcazbLgnd6zEVWE4DbZMWfT27m aBXg/ZZaXDgf+V8eBnrHhnNyGHPvJSoNPecQ51BEPgKO0PptDTARQsZZcXQXEG7nNcpH vS8DmABIfaspk9MUW8BaNhH6m8fL0On84yKyrlzMFAyJ8WyIvNymn2gDerkqtkaNCCOj X8WBs34VafwuuP2CCApz0deYPDFM6NSH74mwobYniXXFQcTCzGaWL7739gjTNSOaUkLd Togg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530e0tKBVm1GB8PWFHjwpn+MPPhr1+nQMCUVwh7PVMWiGL20mwEN 80mCmaUQpcZ2lpNFeMdl0bc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxArG//ut3Rr5Xis6dJ9LZVVRQH/c7glulAcf8X51COgkVFCdzCdtpCTfAdc8H8XP/kcHXBFA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:90d5:: with SMTP id v21mr13955400ejw.123.1600081957408; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.178.15] (178-85-49-174.dynamic.upc.nl. [178.85.49.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 40sm9266638edr.67.2020.09.14.04.12.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Sep 2020 04:12:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20200913212657.va372qd2oeo3jds3@Ergus> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::633; envelope-from=ohwoeowho@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x633.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255630 Archived-At: On 9/13/20 11:26 PM, Ergus wrote: > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 04:36:13PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> ivy+counsel it's a quality package that reached already noticeable >>> popularity.  Does fuzzy completion with vertical output display, and >>> its >>> counsel-M-X shows also the command key binding (feature I consider for >>> my experience a _game changer_ for softening the learning curve). >>> Finally it's already in ELPA. >> >> Last I heard Ivy still had problems with some completion tables (IIRC >> with those completion tables that return non-trivial values from >> `completion-boundaries`, such as the completion table used for >> filenames, tho there might be other issues such as the support for >> unquote/requote).  If that's still the case (it was several years ago), >> then enabling Ivy by default would either introduce regressions when >> completing against such completion tables, or would force us to use >> 2 different UIs (the Ivy one where it works well, as some other UI for >> those other cases) ;-( >> >> >>        Stefan >> > An important part of ivy was re-implemented the last year to simplify > and unify some interfaces and many errors were corrected. > > I use ivy since 4 years ago with not big issues for the moment (When I > have them I have reported and they have been solved almost immediately). > But it needs some improve before becoming part of vanilla. > > It would be very nice if you comment/report/ask that to Abo-Abo. To get > an update of the current status. I'm eager to solve the problems with completion tables. Some of them should already be solved. If there was a bug report with a reproducible scenario, that would make things move faster.     Oleh