From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:08:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20201125210947.GB8228@ACM> <50c96c83-01b4-d2b8-ff90-82c9d706e268@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12148"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Andrii Kolomoiets , emacs-devel@gnu.org, enometh@meer.net, Stefan Monnier , Gregory Heytings , Eli Zaretskii To: Alan Mackenzie , martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 19:11:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZlI-000320-F4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:11:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59612 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZlH-0005lx-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:11:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZkQ-0004zG-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:43714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kxZkO-00081S-TC; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 107IAGin156550; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:10:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=Rnbemq+ckozQuRzRw1EIuciLjIEfwMX7AkTtLbz/h6A=; b=dYbU4D/H1hO8PlPbejxJvbQlTiG27DoCvTpGLn0iFWaxr0mB0iLZaiN4amgzlfzveR9F xj2TrNy0iOAXMTHwGvJW4zToLPoykX8cK3lcI6H8ZViFYJVqbPSLpNULMc6wja8McN7Z 4Txt0k9hwZNLqpEsofrRDoJvbkWaYUvGgOXW+87Lld5JdASKsz1hHj5sbVZN+Q+0IO77 3oCDXS245wbF6P6HLMtQ8eVpwq1xzHBmq48WaQIEcveQhhLiHMc4bH37H0nBDKHUBxdx XtjZUEI58HqjRWbaq+TqUFO6GZxUE+4ADHrAjXcjSsJG+zCT9VF+E4DaOwwdVLM79JkU hQ== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35wftxd7mp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 18:10:50 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 107I1TfU002867; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:08:50 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35w3g3407p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 07 Jan 2021 18:08:50 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 107I8epJ019584; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:08:41 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5095.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9857 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101070106 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9857 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101070107 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.86; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2130.oracle.com X-Spam_score_int: -45 X-Spam_score: -4.6 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.246, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262700 Archived-At: > I've been trying to think through the bit about redirect-frame-focus. > It's difficult. Are you aware of any particular scenarios where it might > go wrong with select-frame-set-input-focus? =20 Apologies for chiming in here. I'm not very knowledgeable about this, and = I can't speak directly to the current context. I can say that I use `redirect-frame-focus' to redirect the focus for a sta= ndalone `*Completions*' frame to a standalone minibuffer frame. And I have= problems with Emacs 27, including bad changes in frame focus. (Dunno whet= her my problems with Emacs 27 are related to this thread.) I also call `select-frame-set-input-focus' a fair amount in my code. And users can, e.g., mouse-click another frame during minibuffer input to s= elect that other frame (or select it in another way), do something with tha= t frame selected, then select the minibuffer frame again, etc. Again, no idea whether what I'm saying here is relevant to the question at = hand. If not, please ignore.