From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:50:32 -0400 Organization: disorganization Message-ID: References: Reply-To: sds@podval.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149598319 23632 80.91.229.2 (6 Jun 2006 12:51:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 06 14:51:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnb20-0003VJ-GV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:51:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnb20-0007Oa-47 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnb1j-0007Mq-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnb1i-0007Kv-5x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnb1h-0007Kl-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fnb94-0003pw-Q3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Fnb1O-0003MW-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:50:58 +0200 Original-Received: from 209.213.205.130 ([209.213.205.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:50:58 +0200 Original-Received: from sds by 209.213.205.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:50:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.213.205.130 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:k62vlqwSqnPjrgBAWM6Hs3O4LOM= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55755 Archived-At: > * Richard Stallman [2006-06-05 22:06:18 -0400]: > > when pop-up-frames is customized to t, the frames proliferate without > end and have to be explicitly deleted. > e.g., C-x m (`compose-mail') now creates a new frame that does not go > away automatically when I hit C-c C-c (`message-send-and-exit'). > > That is what pop-up-frames does. I know, and this is not what a user expects: if a task (C-x m or completion or whatever) has created a frame, it should delete it when done. this is what happens when tasks create windows, this is what should happen when they create frames. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) on Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) http://honestreporting.com http://mideasttruth.com http://truepeace.org http://iris.org.il http://memri.org http://camera.org http://dhimmi.com Between grand theft and a legal fee, there only stands a law degree.