From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elpa.git and `new-master` Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:43:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201216064753.iy5hw63luyi5md6p@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87mtyenmve.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh2dn9g4.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11854"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 16 15:44:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kpY2x-0002yB-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:44:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34160 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpY2w-0000d9-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpY1R-0007xF-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:63545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpY1O-0000ug-TF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:43:20 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 0BGEhDlQ028594 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:43:14 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 0BGEhrwf023221; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:43:53 GMT In-Reply-To: <87zh2dn9g4.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260995 Archived-At: >> Could we not adopt "trunk" again, instead of "master" or "main"? > > "trunk" would definitely be my preference, but it seems like the git > world is settling on "main", and adhering to convention makes things > less confusing, perhaps? > Who said Emacs should adhere to conventions ;-) There are now two votes for "trunk". Who else?