From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay slower in Emacs 28 than Emacs 27 Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:15:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <877dptiro7.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn3lhcdd.fsf@gnus.org> <87czzlwqgi.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11177"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 17:22:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmJHL-0002p3-OX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 17:22:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43640 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmJHK-0006id-Mm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:22:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmJAQ-0000Ip-9S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:15:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:64827) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmJAL-0004IF-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 11:15:14 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 0B7GF3Fd003331 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:15:03 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 0B7GFeqa001518; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 16:15:40 GMT In-Reply-To: <87czzlwqgi.fsf@telefonica.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260499 Archived-At: >> I have no explanation either, and I did not write that the solution was >> to add the "!" back ;-) >> >> What is also odd is that the benchmark does not load any image: it >> loads the "xdisp.c" file and scrolls down until EOF. > > Did you `make bootstrap'? My experience bisecting Emacs says that > reliable results require full builds. > Yes, of course, each built was made on a freshly cloned copy.