From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The Emacs master is much slower than the emacs-27 branch. Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:04:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87czzpsyqn.fsf@gmx.net> <83o8j9eqwx.fsf@gnu.org> <874kl1spe9.fsf@gmx.net> <83blf9em55.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh2tr82r.fsf@gmx.net> <87v9dhr7i5.fsf@gmx.net> <838sadefiw.fsf@gnu.org> <83360le421.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2idcn8q.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnxxcmjr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tut0d7e9.fsf@gnu.org> <8c5fe90c-72ca-a2c3-29d2-1849458bb85a@gmx.at> <87wnxwwbqz.fsf@telefonica.net> <93719f51-14d1-2084-ce04-221344043721@gmx.at> <83v9dgb60a.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1351"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 17:05:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kla3w-0000DL-RS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:05:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kla3v-0005hr-Rq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kla2u-0005BO-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:04:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:58323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kla2q-0004g2-Qg; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 0B5G4Fuq020445 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:04:16 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 0B5G4pZH020241; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:04:51 GMT In-Reply-To: <83v9dgb60a.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260378 Archived-At: >> Like (2), at least with GCC on 64-bit GNU/Linux. Apparently Eli does >> not see this on MS-Windows. > > I'd be surprised if the OS had anything to do with that. If someone can > afford compiling a 32-bit build --with-wide-int on GNU/Linux using GCC 9 > or later, we could see for sure. > Yes, I should have written: "on 32-bit MS-Windows".