From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 22:01:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <53833023-d959-07af-7611-aa2e0bdcc1bc@gmx.at> <0d14bfc4-8e8e-d3b9-e0e1-ee4bf2e6449d@gmx.at> <20201125210947.GB8228@ACM> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39919"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: Andrii Kolomoiets , emacs-devel@gnu.org, martin rudalics , enometh@meer.net, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 28 23:02:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kj8Is-000AG4-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 23:02:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj8Ir-0003y3-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj8I1-0003W1-8s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:01:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kj8Hv-0004h1-8d; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 0ASM1cRe029791 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 28 Nov 2020 22:01:38 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 0ASM1beJ005395; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 22:01:37 GMT In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259978 Archived-At: >> Isn't the main reason for this that it has never been possible to >> interact with a MBn when a MBm, with m > n, was active? > > Well, it's at best an indirect cause of the bug, but yes, it's the > reason why this bug wasn't visible until now. > Put another way, is it not problematic to interact with and/or terminate a recursive edit while one or more higher level recursive edits are underway? Do you think the recipe with more than two frames I just sent demonstrates a bug?