From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:02:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201013190255.GA8896@ACM> <838sca0w7k.fsf@gnu.org> <20201013195103.GB8896@ACM> <87sgahvohq.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20455"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 23:03:52 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kSRSZ-0005EF-PU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 23:03:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52102 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSRSY-00086t-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSRR0-0007HQ-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:02:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:55011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kSRQx-0004kC-Tb; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 17:02:14 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 09DL27WJ005879 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:02:07 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 09DL27Xn022211; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 21:02:07 GMT In-Reply-To: <87sgahvohq.fsf@igel.home> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/13 15:22:16 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257591 Archived-At: >> I agree with you on one thing: C-x 8 RET should raise a "Command >> attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer" error in this case >> (when enable-recursive-minibuffers is nil, which is its default value). >> I'm not sure why it doesn't. > > Because read-char-by-name binds enable-recursive-minibuffers to t. > That's it. I should have checked. Thank you!