From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New multi-command facility displays in the wrong echo area. Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 21:48:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11916"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 09 23:49:47 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kR0Gn-00030S-TQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 23:49:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41432 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kR0Gn-0001UT-0Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kR0G5-00013x-Or for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kR0G3-0002UX-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@otaku.sdf.org [205.166.94.8]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 099LmqFU027826 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:48:52 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 099Lmp1n007812; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 21:48:51 GMT In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/09 17:14:41 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257283 Archived-At: Hi Stefan, >>> (i) In a GUI environment, create two frames, each displaying a buffer. >>> (ii) In frame F1, do C-x b `switch-to-buffer', but don't type anything more. >>> (iii) Move to frame F2, and start an isearch with C-s some-text. >>> >>> Although currently in F2, the isearch's pattern is displayed in the >>> echo area for F1. This is wrong. >> >> FWIW, this behavior has been with us at least since Emacs-21. >> > > I fear that's not correct. I don't see this behavior in Emacs 21 to 26 > (inclusive), it is new in Emacs 27.1. More precisely, it is because the > new variable set-message-function has the default value > set-minibuffer-message. To restore the previous default behavior: > > (setq set-message-function nil) > IMO this could/should be fixed in set-minibuffer-message, by checking that the active minibuffer is on the same frame: (when (and (not noninteractive) (window-live-p (active-minibuffer-window)) (eq (window-frame) (window-frame (active-minibuffer-window))))