From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: feature/icomplete-vertical Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:28:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20200919015957.prffuac2jke3hp6a@Ergus> <20200919061531.oyjlbdvkbeif5fsg@Ergus> <8fb0c822-0e79-4744-83a0-8c2f7ba31180@default> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12820"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: Ergus , Eli Zaretskii , casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 20 02:32:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kJnHC-0003F3-1b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 02:32:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52096 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJnHA-0001sE-Vo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 20:32:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJnDG-0000yW-BR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 20:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:59816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJnDE-0005G6-0K; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 20:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 08K0S3aQ007736 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:28:03 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 08K0SHBD016752; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:28:17 GMT In-Reply-To: <8fb0c822-0e79-4744-83a0-8c2f7ba31180@default> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/19 20:28:10 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256227 Archived-At: >> TBH, it seems to me that using icomplete with a minibuffer-only frame >> does not have much sense. > > Why would you think so? > > I've been using Icomplete since it existed. And I use a standalone > minibuffer frame. > My sentence was indeed not clear enough. What I meant is: it seems to me that using *vertical* icomplete with a minibuffer-only frame does not make much sense.