From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Van Ly Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 10:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Super Dimensional Fortress Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Van Ly Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="17884"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (NEB 202 2017-01-01) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 31 12:04:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jfKpI-0004Wk-AJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 12:04:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfKpH-0006m5-6d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 06:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfKmn-000478-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 May 2020 06:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:55248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jfKml-0000bZ-Ax; Sun, 31 May 2020 06:01:44 -0400 Original-Received: from otaku.sdf.org (IDENT:van.ly@otaku.sdf.org [205.166.94.8]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 04VA1Y1O000724 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sun, 31 May 2020 10:01:34 GMT X-X-Sender: van.ly@otaku.sdf.org In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.20; envelope-from=van.ly+2@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/31 06:01:35 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251672 Archived-At: > > Anyway. FSF associates have the benefit of videoconferencing. After > > observing how people use "zoom" to videochat, can Emacs, VLC, > > multicast streams, Blender's kind of UI combine for more ways to > > work? > > I don't have any idea what that could concretely mean. I suppose > I have nothing against it, but it seems unimportant. I hope this > won't draw effort and attention away from enabling Emacs to do > what we now use LibreOffice for. well it was an ambitious bluesky shot in the dark second guessing where the "puck" will be at, assuming people will work more and more with video streams and automation intelligence, and for Emacs to gain superpower capability, you hear people say the open plan office may not come back beyond this globally viral pandemic for Emacs to catchup to some of LibreOffice's UI capabilities is concretely well-defined for where the "puck" was VanL -- ... dragons do not see stones, fish do not see water.