From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
To: Jordon Biondo <jordonbiondo@gmail.com>
Cc: Emacs development discussions <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:47:05 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701311245100.1908@calancha-pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABB6V6qKOKu3NX+mKg0nHT+=K6Nm95F_DqsRKcnP9NN6RKBt1A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Jordon Biondo wrote:
> A while ago I brought up the inconstant signatures of `setq`, `setq-default` and `setq-local`. In short, I want `setq-local` to
> have the same signature as `setq` and `setq-local`. (setq* VAR VAL VAR VAL...)
> See thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-03/msg00448.html
>
> I appreciate Stefan's input back then, but I'd like to revisit the issue, get further input, and see if I can change some minds
> about the issue.
>
> If you believe the variadic signature of `setq` and `setq-default` is not ideal, consider that backwards compatibility erases any
> chance that those two functions will lose that feature, and consider the benefits of being consistently wrong over being
> inconsistently right.
>
> Are maintainers and users still opposed to this change? If not I'd be happy to update the patch from the previous thread.
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> It is most natural for setq-local to have the same calling convention
> as setq.
+1
FWIW, i am in favour of naturalness too.
Regards,
Tino
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-31 3:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 18:37 Revisiting `setq-local`s signature Jordon Biondo
2017-01-31 3:47 ` Tino Calancha [this message]
2017-01-31 18:13 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-01-31 18:48 ` Tom Tromey
2017-01-31 18:57 ` Drew Adams
2017-01-31 19:13 ` Jordon Biondo
2017-02-01 5:55 ` Tino Calancha
2017-02-02 3:01 ` John Wiegley
2017-02-02 3:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-02-02 14:28 ` Jordon Biondo
2017-02-02 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-02-02 17:43 ` Jordon Biondo
2017-02-02 20:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-02-08 15:59 ` Jordon Biondo
2017-02-10 8:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1701311245100.1908@calancha-pc \
--to=tino.calancha@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jordonbiondo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).