From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add facility to collect stderr of async subprocess Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 12:13:11 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2yfx8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <83egomxog1.fsf@gnu.org> <83ego5tjgt.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftno4fr.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <55247A98.5020302@cs.ucla.edu> <83r3rvgn4e.fsf@gnu.org> <877ftja89d.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <87wphnwh2q.fsf@gmail.com> <83zimjl1zp.fsf@gnu.org> <83vax7l00s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475723645 2300 195.159.176.226 (6 Oct 2016 03:14:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 03:14:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) To: jwiegley@gmail.com, Tino Calancha , Emacs developers , Eli Zaretskii , Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 05:14:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1brz83-0007HT-7Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 05:13:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brz81-0005Yu-OA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 23:13:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brz7X-0005Yp-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 23:13:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brz7U-0005qv-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 23:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x244.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244]:34657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brz7U-0005qJ-3b; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 23:13:16 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x244.google.com with SMTP id r9so367979paz.1; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=JJMDGafNR2cK5RJ0KnGenpgQJwYC0eIp730RHcct3n0=; b=la0Ry/VwubrPMYWWBBcpQnH0wiTZ6w8HngF5J/KNxiIjNbSaXFY3E1kdbyudKva4LH Y6T+J/YxA4pQFjsD+lU2mr+dyN/ny2tC3SHa1AkzD9YExVlcP17Jlp/hijvk4GbQfcbC KV1b//fsDWUGoOTcO5A5+g470BV5+Pi++XehcMDMrYqzkw2nyRlg7wUFT7gkfm437sDw R80iw+E8sVCxtjbOZiVRPrBADPly0Ij+sxXrJRSnk6eTPB7mt4KON10f3E545jg+MWE4 hGo1gAdaBHTAwyN9zXGUdbzH0i9nvqL6YYmH7/p0wl+i6nS5IbtFGeygyMqWtT9pnw2z lUPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JJMDGafNR2cK5RJ0KnGenpgQJwYC0eIp730RHcct3n0=; b=eyfl4FU05h4W57V+Q7MoIlQjJHeWYMYDEKrxaLcp334tm8aAPSACoPflgnMAEdpcMr 5BLHIyiCjMxWVyVHD9SckxY4R97DXCEM0gIXBIBRQyeUYBU/hwYxUAGgeNS1EMr8+pkW YeNYK1F53JLqKVHh9KlUmmihKyzImo/WsUAl0PAJf7dgHx0/w98Sb7RJWfCjTBza6gX3 15/ssIm5eAAVjGwmEbdclFpZrvbGPT+osBzxi0caDwWL0mamW4I9pQimAn/2I/t15YBG K3IQCE3OQPMW4+0s1AqTsmbFZqDlzvRQ+CmxlGd3BGK+ds8Wz+Y5r/IevAAimS56GSmO ma/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmK/k4+9jIX5O6RL+Cyg/UH5KNL4swS4ehlFrjD2qynKJ3ysaLLiDjV74QjO+N9sA== X-Received: by 10.66.94.163 with SMTP id dd3mr18342220pab.194.1475723595238; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (57.92.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp. [220.100.92.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b4sm17669473paw.10.2016.10.05.20.13.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:13:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::244 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208017 Archived-At: On Wed, 5 Oct 2016, John Wiegley wrote: > Since we have `make-process' for cases like this, I don't see a need to extend > `call-process'. I'd rather we made changes like this either because (a) lots > of people want it or (b) it's blocking someone from doing something -- and not > purely from a desire for consistency. I see such changes as wholly unnecessary > at this time. Well, it's not just my typical wish of consistency in what the functions should do... it's also a matter of consistency with Emacs own TODO list: We have an entry in the TODO list requesting exactly what i am suggesting :-) Question: can we conclude that following entry in TODO file has being fulfilled by Daiki work? ----- -** Give start-process the ability to direct standard-error - output to a different filter. ----- The entry mentions `start-process' which currently cannot do the stdout, stderr separation. As pointed out by Michael, `start-file-process' either. If we understand this entry as: ----- Give Emacs the ability to direct standard-error output to a different filter on asynchronous processes. ----- then it's already done and we can drop such entry from TODO file. Regards, Tino