From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 03:25:06 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <83oa3db20a.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474741604 25792 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2016 18:26:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 18:26:44 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 20:26:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnref-0005Am-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 20:26:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnred-0005om-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:26:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnreV-0005mz-AI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnreT-0000UK-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:26:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:33332) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnreM-0000SV-HW; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id hm5so49855132pac.0; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:26:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lAgmgChIQipvL8ngvqp3VTfh0DuVVve8TRuklEmjRNQ=; b=Ql4HhKGpF97FWjQAA6pMolBOERtubQFm5yfIcHNCGS2/jTBKZJoEvdueb0DXScSZKh djNUoncsL+APqZA5FAmo3rbL5jhQbgooKe553HLF8BzYrBleWeOSEYRsj02xE0hanQJT atSaw+MZmJpEdv7YIXe5G5OdxcbdZlSmDOa8rA15FwGu//UbfeMWgN7ZH4EvNmhAhVcz NUR4bHGE6wSsLP+WWxu2V9rvocqfsXAfjazdeTjM9y0p3xhRij3EVbvy6vdmT8a41DAR 4Bs2Mk8I/eQBdxDCcxHT+G5rNcAZPpgqsTuoTAKLrUotRCN0C1P9+alC/RAtQNsOeuD9 HzbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lAgmgChIQipvL8ngvqp3VTfh0DuVVve8TRuklEmjRNQ=; b=Th9qb1qXTY2mWWPyeGVXCZ/Hm1xyFvwVp+cKX50Hso4z5kbnjjIAH0QEdE1AGBTytr TMycStdOcjfJ9YqfZ3GwAk5FaGs8rcHiaBjNzA7N1h5sPWzTUfxkVBTjI9OmLHQLeXSe vKCeXnm9tCoqBin1aX8zW2Ofso8aodWWj4YXWbPlSlrJ2qNNN4/brTyv3ValSLegm6SB uQLy/+UI8P3bIuOflNGQqW+f9xETd6ok33GCsNXuCk1zIRzPjwggAMppi2QAi5xopdlU jUM/lPBK9rTYVvhVxV3lkfK/WuaOXGIrJSRTouHyfqpG4VasZiw+mk7ibOTK/yRYn/bf zWiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnF8W+u6MWuo/JaVGHNAnlCvbUBMDVN4Q0v82iUl2lrfTiwFbABQehEjSBpsxasBw== X-Received: by 10.66.25.50 with SMTP id z18mr8389646paf.151.1474741510032; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (57.92.100.220.dy.bbexcite.jp. [220.100.92.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k77sm20010001pfj.65.2016.09.24.11.25.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:25:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <83oa3db20a.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207756 Archived-At: On Sat, 24 Sep 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Tino Calancha >> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 02:31:30 +0900 (JST) >> Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com >> >> I) Add optional argument in 6) unflag-p to behave as the others. >> II) Add a new command `dired-mark-or-unmark-extension', as >> `dired-mark-extension' but, in interactive calls: >> * A prefix argument _unmark_ files. >> I propose to rebind '* .' to this command instead of the >> `dired-mark-extension'. >> After I) and II) we have an uniform behaviour for all >> commands marking files which are bound to keys. Powerful and easy >> to remember. > > I'm okay with that proposal, but please leave the "* ." key sequence > at its present binding. For the new dired-mark-or-unmark-extension > command, I can propose "* e" or "* x", which are not yet taken, both > of them mnemonically resembling "EXtension". The binding "* e" looks very intuitive and easy to remember. Thank you.