From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Use specific functions to create shell processes Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:25:42 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <83lgzkex1y.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472207197 25535 195.159.176.226 (26 Aug 2016 10:26:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:26:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 26 12:26:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bdELI-0006Dx-NV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:26:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59845 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdELF-0000ze-Ut for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdEKj-0000zZ-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:25:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdEKh-0007QW-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]:35311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdEKd-0007Ns-MO; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x72so27579735pfd.2; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:25:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=8rWEeYXgGohuk6Yofc1tUaQoUBdeTV9bnjmQHvQ5jjA=; b=bxZGt4enia1beVgfT+qKcOLwABBwy7ddH93Q9n1uSB7NHr1elWucdUUcfZ4l7dCx/G 5uCZaocdgeKiVuSvfHnEvO9dKcl9J3elVoT4uEiwMsfFA0H2GGB/bXgxlTqSzcf3CmEU 9OgnP0tCiYGiXNGTWZ9h7IaZCAdZrzg55hkfDkLS2ITuVrk1dTuXnvusj8aLlY8oZSB4 YADtAs9FxJ+8Dp5iZD+3d2BBh4JbRS02DG3TMO3LVkPgQZ5zYPMU1QnCxMmKcuFKl3tv Jes35Xpk9qXv0oI7lVMI6IzX6qehn69HsrUTqcFCuGnAlV19h4pHaOJC55qHZMVgdQGx pNqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8rWEeYXgGohuk6Yofc1tUaQoUBdeTV9bnjmQHvQ5jjA=; b=Exvi4o5NFV4OBhXRK50dRx/ekudxefKBKcdbeNVQy6XklD4K0psWJl30XPJs/wsXvM 63pwbPOUBJqxzCN/JSVmW0upF5sO5CsFZIwXpWrExnoCFuIVPx11ADcB6MTGjKGF0vZA U1lOd2rFLb5GQzmz2PCLmA9ZVZhoMZAqQgy6Ee8T8uqlfXrT4aiqqOOk/hpTYWLlGC1u A+4WK+axNuHbIeEs7NIdzolkABpCe6goE5pK/Twy42eLtN8cRX2MlKPY9UHlY1Sio50S IVWzSvBmtwJc6tKNEqhrL3wTWNRM5zG8MyxKnUN1b5Z2hGzOsb1MHkhF9w7YXwdh2iy+ Z5yw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPW1OnRDASOhX8xC8D5yp1ABGNOIWSfbVb0TIpke/LAqMWcZhH7OiA/nWLp1of62g== X-Received: by 10.98.50.2 with SMTP id y2mr4533767pfy.138.1472207150694; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l128sm27483831pfl.21.2016.08.26.03.25.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:25:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <83lgzkex1y.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206818 Archived-At: On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks for working on this. > > Like I said in the past, I'd like us to have a test for each > functionality whose implementation we are refactoring. Can we do that > in this case? Thank you for the e-mail. I will prepare tests for each of the 33 functions changed in the patch. Once i finish i will reactivate this thread.