From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs as browser (was Re: Concurrency, again) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:59 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <83mvi9a3mh.fsf@gnu.org> <20161012165911.58437154@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161012173314.799d1dc5@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <8360owaj2s.fsf@gnu.org> <20161013092701.77461800@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161017105345.2f255760@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83y41nx8l6.fsf@gnu.org> <20161017123459.5ded9408@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87vawosoul.fsf@elephly.net> <20161019090741.46ea2704@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161019163806.7c77f100@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83twc7tqxr.fsf@gnu.org> <20161020111527.26bf4ab9@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83h987t4c0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477080387 16462 195.159.176.226 (21 Oct 2016 20:06:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 20:06:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dov Grobgeld Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 21 22:06:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bxg4w-0002GA-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 22:06:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxg4z-0007P0-4l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxfjd-0006Zp-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:44:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxfjY-00088R-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:44:09 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:46082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bxfjY-000883-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218F0161328; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id PO7NNJpGTYjz; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7025A161329; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id PN4AsNVoRqvp; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56BBE161309; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 131.179.128.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208587 Archived-At: On 10/21/2016 12:31 AM, Dov Grobgeld wrote: > My feeling is that the only issue in the bug tracker that you may need > an "cairo expert" for, is the memory leak in #22961. The rest of the > bugs are more related to exposure triggered redraws and interaction > with the window manager. These are certainly related to the cairo > branch, but have nothing to do with cairo per se. I assume you meant Bug#22691, not Bug#22961. Did you build the origin/old-branches/cairo branch with ImageMagick as well? The master-branch Cairo problems I ran into involved interaction with ImageMagick (Bug#21110, Bug#22442). Or is that interaction also a refresh issue? (Please bear with me, as I know little about Cairo.)