From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Automatic (e)tags generation and incremental updates Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 01:50:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <779a6328-9ca5-202a-25a2-b270c66fe6dd@yandex.ru> <8fc5e96c-ebb8-c668-9b2a-c7c4ee54c0b9@yandex.ru> <83r1mwltob.fsf@gnu.org> <0bee9ab4-46bc-b6fd-97b6-e26cc80f1610@yandex.ru> <875z45dbm7.fsf@tromey.com> <1e9c9572-52ee-339b-78a2-731b9eb5f3de@yandex.ru> <871resd93f.fsf@tromey.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6115"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, john@yates-sheets.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 00:51:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kykUm-0001TX-CK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:51:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kykUl-0006FM-Ex for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kykTW-0005Rj-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:50:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::433]:45348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kykTT-0004aP-Mo; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:50:22 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id d26so14585789wrb.12; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:50:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bWd47Zus8Ox5g/+HdASiCO2ntT7RmkZjV/+WejxtmeU=; b=nZYhCbDpo9P3BCH7eeT56KjkP3DlN4sCjsvxjRtNAzLxEMmCiPMki92f4JSD4CoTP5 xFQ3XFtoyUvTAYw+UxyfyRy4o6csuPLro11mVsiUhyZqPeIaKjDDSLlm49Man4bgTqJe +vTqsqg34g6Ns+9FPVWJK+xCJsNgT1BD9RmD179zwhWxHiRg1UgQWuhwWkklQYdQO78X rR1eRx0yba0jcO8Gu3W7fdlftDdBfcTRqooddxqgE1rYvuuamb8oIVRctTZGVcbU28vs oogPQZA49MtpTpvB/TGv/dBnmKkbnJTcqYkuHwnf2mLwE5VJwnPeUwTDRU/UR+esOP1z CL+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bWd47Zus8Ox5g/+HdASiCO2ntT7RmkZjV/+WejxtmeU=; b=CjKLFngSMTUyyeIcbPiy4t13mYZ1hw8UbAPiB8MQuG8GRekRBt1KgKLIwEzWrFpLKN wcz12qNQah0Wtrr3ycWqR4VOlTNfZHFd0HLoBedk8dTqRX8lqnUd5xjlVyrHJ9WpTKK4 o5qqTqR9lbLHI0C8CaQIMZ5+lEN+vMryILfvJg2Rr+NJa9kQsG6N0P84OuBeahiUcPFX IIBsJRuOL5rW4r0dIwIhSHCfXbIkux6RAlnilllhJSsL4V/s0e65Q1xqCyhkTmOFWpe6 A8p65U/GHC5zYc5WI7qiqz3bUXq5pL8Q/wlOihLx8s+iLq50GqZxMpiyvvcKz7FL6vGp TJ2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TmZn105eEk6xjsLoBvuHFGLCEG8mEcbzQ3syp91RxXsbcF2vr /WnVMxwtzjVWBhFXNK85tD4WB0fVoBTYcw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkS7j3mLbhOx2W+/Iup69/Zm4+CPzohw7H2EmLN34xRy1Vt1oKymIyfVM+YKbj7r/LrHGTRw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6852:: with SMTP id o18mr13398523wrw.371.1610322617577; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:50:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm23571272wrz.18.2021.01.10.15.50.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:50:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::433; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x433.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.012, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262890 Archived-At: On 11.01.2021 01:36, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > but even searching for a single file name in a big enough tags file can > take half a second). Correction: it's actually writing the updated file to disk which takes half a second. This call: (write-region (point-min) (point-max) buffer-file-name nil 'silent) I wonder if *that* could be done asynchronously.