From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:07:00 +0900 Message-ID: References: <93fed91b-cb8a-4de7-9a16-62c85654bab6@well-done.deisui.org> <6662a3b9-1148-4aa0-bd2d-29a67be38d76@well-done.deisui.org> <5a520e06-4ee3-4c4f-9345-d49a666516f9@well-done.deisui.org> <7f60c21d-2f66-4c4b-9abb-e377ca24a153@well-done.deisui.org> <844cd50a-ec18-4b09-a057-35bdfb5173fd@well-done.deisui.org> <8ba25607-9381-4a27-ae53-8b0f3ccc3ac1@well-done.deisui.org> <366fa6ab-42a0-4df5-a17f-4ac3d1744d78@well-done.deisui.org> <87ejjf50pk.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184112442 8633 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2007 00:07:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 11 02:07:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I8Pjh-0006gt-5w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:07:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Pjf-00082D-Dh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Pjb-00080L-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Pja-0007z6-0r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8PjZ-0007yg-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from 221x255x76x220.ap221.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([221.255.76.220] helo=localhost) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I8PjX-0006H0-JU; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=well-done.deisui.org ident=ueno) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1I8PjQ-0001pI-I1; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:07:00 +0900 X-Attribution: DU Mail-Copies-To: poster In-Reply-To: <87ejjf50pk.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:54:31 +0900") X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74611 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64918 Archived-At: >>>>> In <87ejjf50pk.fsf@catnip.gol.com> >>>>> Miles Bader wrote: > Daiki Ueno writes: > >> That can happen later. For now let's just do the simple and > >> straight-forward thing. > > > > Perhaps. However, it might be better to include EasyPG before synching > > Gnus, because it has been the default PGP backend of the Gnus trunk for > > one year and has been tested. If we revert the pgg*.el, we will need to > > wait a while for testing. > Since easypg isn't included in the gnus trunk or emacs trunk (how can it > be "the default" if it isn't included?), surely it would require testing > too. What I mean by "the default" is that if EasyPG is installed Gnus will give it precedence over PGG. Since EasyPG is not a library exclusively used by Gnus, it has been developped outside the Gnus repository. The point is, if there are any points of the interface between Gnus and PGG (as you said), we have to change the caller (i.e. Gnus) and it might cause a new bug. On the other hand, EasyPG does not need such a change. If EasyPG is merged before the Gnus synch, users can continue to use Gnus' PGP commands via EasyPG while fixing Gnus and PGG issues. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno