From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:09:04 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3CC5E770.9060108@cs.berkeley.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019625165 4819 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 05:12:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xemacs-design@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170F5B-0001Fc-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:12:45 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170F6h-0000PQ-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:14:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170F56-000479-00; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:12:40 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170F3X-00044v-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA05293; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:09:05 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Michael Toomim In-Reply-To: <3CC5E770.9060108@cs.berkeley.edu> Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3157 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3157 On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Michael Toomim wrote: > For instance, if I type M-x some-command-with-a-keybinding, XEmacs will say > "Hey, you could do that faster by just using C-x M-foo S-bar C-M-S-xfoobar". This feature already exists, doesn't it? I think it was even mentioned in this thread a couple of days ago. > Software agents are a great idea... clippy is just a little too obtrusive and > has way too much personality (nobody like's a microsoft personality). I think it's annoying because it pops too frequently and too unconditionally, and because it's hard to tell it "get lost!".