From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Terje Bless Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:27:47 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87n0vw2y0v.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019607185 15749 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2002 00:13:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: xemacs-design@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170APB-00045u-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 02:13:05 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170AQb-00024L-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 02:14:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170AOu-0005NS-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.wavelan.no ([217.144.228.111] helo=isa) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170AMw-0005GH-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [217.144.228.69] by isa (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.1.1)); Wed, 24 Apr 2002 02:13:14 +0200 Original-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <87n0vw2y0v.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mailsmith Prerelease (Blindsider) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3145 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3145 Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: >These issues are inherently hard to tease out. I think that as long as we all agree on this statement, we'll be fine no matter where we end up. :-)