From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Toomim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:51:48 -0700 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3CC5AA37.5040208@cs.berkeley.edu> <2950-Tue23Apr2002222955+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019606089 14268 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2002 23:54:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, link@pobox.com, xemacs-design@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170A7V-0003i1-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:54:49 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170A8u-0001i0-00 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:56:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170A7E-0004M7-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:54:32 -0400 Original-Received: from front2.mail.megapathdsl.net ([66.80.60.30]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170A4V-0004EQ-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:51:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.36.77.18] (HELO cheeseskin) by front2.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.8) with ESMTP id 27591156; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:45:35 -0700 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=cs.berkeley.edu ident=toomim) by cheeseskin with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 170A4b-0002FV-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:51:49 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020412 Debian/0.9.9-6 X-Accept-Language: en Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3142 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3142 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Sorry, I don't understand how did you deduce that from my language. I > never meant anything like that. What part of my wording implied such > a hostile intent? > > All I meant to say was what I said: that it surprises me why would > someone avoid existing documentation even though it might be easily > accessible and helpful. > I don't think in such categories. To me, anyone and everyone > deserves to use XEmacs. > You're right. I'm sorry, I just re-read what you said in light of your comments, and I take back what I said in that post.