From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <84ipvkx1da.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87d3ls7n3b.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vczdwjuk.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87k4fr3koi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aagn2tpr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrjquacf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj05svwh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp11imgb.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <8739mc5nes.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipuubao6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwpjfkkz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp072fb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5vimm5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zknjmcyk.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303456051 517 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2011 07:07:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 22 09:07:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QDASb-0000kj-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:07:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47763 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDASa-00022p-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:07:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDASX-00022g-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDASX-0004Mn-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDASX-0004Mj-5o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38775) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDASV-0001sO-H7; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 03:07:19 -0400 X-Spook: chameleon man Arnett Baranyi Qaddafi United Nations X-Ran: 7q?%5quh/{X~2\@mbci'T?JG/74xQy*IHnt1mtWp_N?:~b|u8WZV8_hWZ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138635 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov wrote: > +echo " Does Emacs use -lgnutls certificate verify callbacks? ${HAVE_GNUTLS_CALLBACK_CERTIFICATE_VERIFY}" Is this really necessary? Not every component of every feature needs to be advertised at the end of configure. Also, IMO there's no way that the changes ascribed to Claudio Bley in this patch can be called a tiny change. The limit of needing copyright paperwork is 10-15 lines, and that's cumulative over all changes. The configure.bat part alone looks bigger than that.