From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:44:16 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> <83lfmxgt6c.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhbcg6s4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="83646"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , Richard Stallman , EMACS development team To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 22:45:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jOouO-000Lbh-OF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 22:45:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54914 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOouN-00086G-Qg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOotb-0007P9-81 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:44:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOotZ-0007Qm-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:44:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.135]:30093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOotZ-0007Pi-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:44:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1586983467; bh=7Nd0KT94Lwqx1UdS02Qbop8GeqP378bEwoyoj5RqC60=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iI7o/fmv9tUNosI2YGEP2WipdcuT+P0UYCMyeRlKHNPOlL/6YzLawGYUfG7BYfdV4 gL3hSqZJvC210ZvYot9xGCO7me/PbbjTvj3wNhSaRuOAtl9enTTIvMEyNkLaOf2bO7 HUSpiSZ7Rf6AQvURqj4+iAzOB2JMKWYYL68sF6RA= In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.135 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247057 Archived-At: > For the original poster, because they might be used to running > primarily a distribution-installed version of emacs: the code for > unix-based GUIs has supported a variety of these sorts of elements > for a very long time, depending (currently) on whether you build > emacs with the Athena, Lucid, Motif, Athena3D, or gtk[,2,3] > toolkits. Under macOS, one has the ns and mac ports, and under MS > Windows, it uses the local gui toolkit (which I believe=C2=A0is the core > W32 look and feel, not the frequently-shifting WPF, Windows Forms, > Metro, UWP, etc. standards).=C2=A0 I use the official windows build and it looks like this which is definitely not how buttons look in windows dialogs: https://i.imgur.com/TjaMGwF.png The native buttons don't have a thick shadow like this.