From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:39:39 +0300 (IDT) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019367760 2016 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2002 05:42:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Terje Bless , jas@extundo.com, bradym@balestra.org, xemacs-design@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16zA7U-0000WP-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:42:40 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16zA7Z-0004wg-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:42:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zA7J-0002Ev-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 01:42:29 -0400 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16zA6J-0002AV-00 for ; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 01:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2]) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA03179; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:39:40 +0300 (IDT) X-Sender: eliz@is Original-To: Hrvoje Niksic In-Reply-To: Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2910 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2910 On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > > So to improve the "manual" for /me/ you'd have to remove every > > reference to lisp from it. > > I don't think the XEmacs manual makes all that many references to > Lisp. Neither do I. It's possible that a few references are here and there, but by and large, Lisp is not an important player in the user manual.