From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: The minibuffer vs. Dialog Boxes (Re: Making XEmacs be more up-to-date)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:28:43 +0300 (IDT)
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <a9tiv3$1f2$2@main.gmane.org>
References: <sxs8z7inobz.fsf@florida.arsdigita.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019367203 1506 127.0.0.1 (21 Apr 2002 05:33:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 05:33:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jas@extundo.com, link@pobox.com, bradym@balestra.org,
        xemacs-design@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16z9yV-0000OB-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:33:23 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16z9yZ-0004mg-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 07:33:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16z9yI-0001iB-00; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 01:33:10 -0400
Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16z9vk-0008WO-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 01:30:32 -0400
Original-Received: from is (is [199.203.121.2])
	by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA03052;
	Sun, 21 Apr 2002 09:28:43 +0300 (IDT)
X-Sender: eliz@is
Original-To: Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@arsdigita.com>
In-Reply-To: <sxs8z7inobz.fsf@florida.arsdigita.de>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2907
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2907


On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@fencepost.gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > The menu itself shows the keybinding, if any, that invokes the same
> > command.  Isn't that good enough?
> 
> It's not good enough for what Terje was complaining about.  Under
> XEmacs, if you open the "Buffers" menu, you can choose the buffer you
> want to go to.  But there is no keybinding equivalent to "go to buffer
> named foo.c", hence none is written.  In this case, one must learn the
> procedure by reading the manual.

So how about a feature whereby a menu item could specify a related 
command, or a list of commands?  That info could be used by various help 
facilities, like display the commands in the echo area or in a tooltip, 
etc.