From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:59:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83h79tjd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11f58780b580@heytings.org> <83v8y8ij39.fsf@gnu.org> <6a5bb5a08b3d764611f9@heytings.org> <6a5bb5a08b5ba0712eae@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CEFFwNV2ot" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14669"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, larsi@gnus.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 20:05:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnbI-0003X6-4U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 20:05:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32892 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnbG-0008LA-No for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:04:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnWC-0004KS-9d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:43006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCnWA-00022P-9p; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 13:59:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1643223580; bh=YF/2eyhdCzLX2UKFRxZFmPgalZFg6aT5D87KVmf8F6Y=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=n7sXahs68ZcWAtfpxQEHYH8CtDZzdGrbIVwaLcwNGtykjTLuYWWxKeLAGpy5aQKD6 XJSLMwsP+hbiBRDjQ+NlI5yYWfgtNq0fFQo3xRqAxGT4vGio0wEHuEw3hh6B7uDb5Z xVauBb3LDoBLbNfcebNrJxPfeeZbo+3Z89cF6kTRLylN7qLY2BgQCgtJmud13vr++H xu7HvbzeQAcL0LpsV3MtuRWTdPeCxFUhHHlbapTUledwJ4VpH7RsC6UH1/WIl+Qmd+ XM2WmkH5UdzE7eghQ8KlWv9sUE8oAmlw+D5W4q+kVRXzsmBBC0+YyrgfchjrKyq2gf WY+znZhZI8Lfw== In-Reply-To: Content-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285450 Archived-At: --CEFFwNV2ot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-ID: > > What you reported was more educated guesses than results. > No, these are results. > > Why don't you actually _measure_ some hopefully typical Emacs use, and > tell us exactly how you got these measurements. Start off saying how > you configured your build, followed by calling emacs -Q, with all the > other detailed steps needed to duplicate your measurements. > This information is all upthread, but in case you missed it, I'll repeat it here. I built Emacs with its standard configuration options (IOW I just typed "make" in a fresh clone of the repository), on an up-to-date and unloaded Debian bookworm machine. To split the time of make check between compilation and execution, I used the attached patch (which I already sent upthread). >> You may have seen that this optimization has no effect without >> --with-native-compilation. This may explain that. > > The bootstrap time without native compilation is much shorter in any > case. > This is an unrelated question, but no, it is not. With just "make" (IOW without --with-native-compilation) I do not see a significant difference between 10083e788f and 808917b3fc. --CEFFwNV2ot Content-Type: text/x-diff; name=Add-a-target-to-byte-compile-all-tests-without-runni.patch; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Add-a-target-to-byte-compile-all-tests-without-runni.patch RnJvbSA3YWQ1YTVlYjAwODMxNWJmNDAwNjFlNWFhZDhhOGQwMDE3ODdmMmJm IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcgMDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQ0KRnJvbTogR3JlZ29yeSBIZXl0 aW5ncyA8Z3JlZ29yeUBoZXl0aW5ncy5vcmc+DQpEYXRlOiBTdW4sIDIzIEph biAyMDIyIDIxOjQ1OjIxICswMDAwDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIEFkZCBh IHRhcmdldCB0byBieXRlLWNvbXBpbGUgYWxsIHRlc3RzIHdpdGhvdXQgcnVu bmluZyB0aGVtDQoNCiogdGVzdC9NYWtlZmlsZS5pbjogQWRkIGEgY2hlY2st Ynl0ZS1jb21waWxlIHRhcmdldC4NCiogTWFrZWZpbGUuaW46IEFkZCB0aGUg Y2hlY2stYnl0ZS1jb21waWxlIHRhcmdldCB0byBDSEVDS19UQVJHRVRTLg0K LS0tDQogTWFrZWZpbGUuaW4gICAgICB8IDIgKy0NCiB0ZXN0L01ha2VmaWxl LmluIHwgMyArKysNCiAyIGZpbGVzIGNoYW5nZWQsIDQgaW5zZXJ0aW9ucygr KSwgMSBkZWxldGlvbigtKQ0KDQpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvTWFrZWZpbGUuaW4g Yi9NYWtlZmlsZS5pbg0KaW5kZXggOGFjNmY1Mjc0Ni4uZTFhY2YxMzU1MSAx MDA2NDQNCi0tLSBhL01ha2VmaWxlLmluDQorKysgYi9NYWtlZmlsZS5pbg0K QEAgLTEwMTQsNyArMTAxNCw3IEBAIFRBR1MgdGFnczoNCiAJJChNQUtFKSAt QyBkb2MvbGlzcHJlZiB0YWdzDQogCSQoTUFLRSkgLUMgZG9jL21pc2MgdGFn cw0KIA0KLUNIRUNLX1RBUkdFVFMgPSBjaGVjayBjaGVjay1tYXliZSBjaGVj ay1leHBlbnNpdmUgY2hlY2stYWxsDQorQ0hFQ0tfVEFSR0VUUyA9IGNoZWNr IGNoZWNrLW1heWJlIGNoZWNrLWV4cGVuc2l2ZSBjaGVjay1hbGwgY2hlY2st Ynl0ZS1jb21waWxlDQogLlBIT05ZOiAkKENIRUNLX1RBUkdFVFMpDQogJChD SEVDS19UQVJHRVRTKTogYWxsDQogCSQoTUFLRSkgLUMgdGVzdCAkQA0KZGlm ZiAtLWdpdCBhL3Rlc3QvTWFrZWZpbGUuaW4gYi90ZXN0L01ha2VmaWxlLmlu DQppbmRleCA5YWQ5OTRlMTEwLi44NWUxZTBjNWU1IDEwMDY0NA0KLS0tIGEv dGVzdC9NYWtlZmlsZS5pbg0KKysrIGIvdGVzdC9NYWtlZmlsZS5pbg0KQEAg LTMyNyw2ICszMjcsOSBAQCAuUEhPTlk6DQogY2hlY2stbWF5YmU6IGNoZWNr LW5vLWF1dG9tYXRlZC1zdWJkaXINCiAJQCR7TUFLRX0gY2hlY2stZG9pdCBT RUxFQ1RPUj0iJHtTRUxFQ1RPUl9BQ1RVQUx9Ig0KIA0KK2NoZWNrLWJ5dGUt Y29tcGlsZToNCisJQCR7TUFLRX0gJChFTEZJTEVTOi5lbD0uZWxjKQ0KKw0K ICMjIFJ1biB0aGUgdGVzdHMuDQogLlBIT05ZOiBjaGVjay1kb2l0DQogIyMg V2UgY2FuJ3QgcHV0IExPR0ZJTEVTIGFzIHByZXJlcXVpc2l0ZXMsIGJlY2F1 c2UgdGhhdCB3b3VsZCBzdG9wIHRoZQ0KLS0gDQoyLjM0LjENCg0K --CEFFwNV2ot--