From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:44:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83mtjwzwkb.fsf@gnu.org> <87r198ytog.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgnvyb5y.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl03j10s.fsf@gnus.org> <9D116A4B-622F-4C80-83E6-2CDD7ED9AD25@acm.org> <58bb8030d532070ed420@heytings.org> <58bb8030d541aae78775@heytings.org> <835yqbmwoo.fsf@gnu.org> <58bb8030d512db2dc614@heytings.org> <831r0zm2yx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20005"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mattiase@acm.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 23 22:47:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkha-0004xt-Q5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:47:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38222 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkhZ-00061v-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkf1-0004Ye-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:44:31 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:38676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nBkex-0001O0-68; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 16:44:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1642974263; bh=c82H3HeL8szQ2UDkFcufteWiM5Q/LPjLYQ3Cyv5wSD4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=GR9ESVDrcuchsNqKtq5ZPsS0pbdhkfT8pyvlS/nztCYbWORGSal1SGvdge5Zvvuyi AEsBXQV2CRAkCMe/ha2E/jOe2fgcPjIYreqUd/EkRdII8NOKBS5MZ4pQuJLinC5M64 Wacxltk/pygKvwW7lnxAwe80s3SgD0VwbMbkjZSeMNanJBBk+MbvSySq3lJQNdoMIh 59iNKFK8LMiB2MTtlGA2N3yNv32LFKmL2rkmiLyln4++vtCW71Sn1fXBcaqBSCDnIa +gMei6hASaE+/T7+Tdbe+aFftibFyTFRiaryPEmyCD+7tExOljvTbVbVtFzmosdij/ Yi4DvyWpGwDWw== In-Reply-To: <831r0zm2yx.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285274 Archived-At: >> I don't know, but I just compared 7922131bb2 vs 3b33a14380, and in most >> cases 7922131bb2 is even a bit slower than correct-warning-pos: >> >> make -j1 bootstrap: 654s vs 596s >> make -j4 bootstrap: 256s vs 238s >> make -j8 bootstrap: 201s vs 183s >> >> make -j1 check: 181s vs 162s >> make -j4 check: 45s vs 40s >> make -j8 check: 26s vs 23s > > Is that an optimized or an unoptimized build of Emacs? > It's a standard build, with the default build options, on Debian bookworm. The commands above are exactly what I typed in a fresh clone of the repository. IOW, CFLAGS='-g3 -O2'.