From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time resolution in Emacs Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:32:36 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <5ed963b2-3fa8-48d8-627e-bc0571d15b43@gmail.com> <52fb10fb-892a-f273-3be8-28793f27e204@cs.ucla.edu> <5cd820d4-ae67-43d4-9e63-c284d51ff1e4@gmail.com> <83tuapvcxs.fsf@gnu.org> <6efc5d24-34a2-fd30-cd20-fe4ac3e48310@cs.ucla.edu> <83fsm8tdzl.fsf@gnu.org> <9e4781b2-2ffa-b1ce-09b4-ead82cad9038@cs.ucla.edu> <83ilr3siku.fsf@gnu.org> <4e41671c-fae8-61c4-845c-4c7ba4317e88@cs.ucla.edu> <83fsm7sh2s.fsf@gnu.org> <83czhbsgc2.fsf@gnu.org> <33fb24fb-282b-cc13-a597-e7b63f19982d@cs.ucla.edu> <83y1zzq6kd.fsf@gnu.org> <837d7hr8s3.fsf@gnu.org> <83czh8pb54.fsf@gnu.org> <55cea2fb-958a-7ca8-a26c-90b0e70e5ada@cs.ucla.edu> <83fsm3nh9h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23111"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Cc: manikulin@gmail.com, corwin@bru.st, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 17:33:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nj0iW-0005vE-5T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:33:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nj0iV-0004sq-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nj0hf-0003hm-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:32:44 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:55378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nj0hd-0007ud-71; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152481600E5; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:32:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id CQa540JZJufW; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5461600DB; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:32:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id P23xwL2fs61K; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-172-91-119-151.socal.res.rr.com [172.91.119.151]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B5781600D4; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83fsm3nh9h.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=131.179.128.68; envelope-from=eggert@cs.ucla.edu; helo=zimbra.cs.ucla.edu X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288858 Archived-At: On 4/23/22 23:10, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > You are actually arguing for moving from > millisecond resolution to nanosecond resolution No, I am not actually arguing for that. Not at all. Again, there is miscommunication. Let's drop the topic of timestamp resolution on MS-Windows. You say 15.625 ms resolution suffices on that platform and you're an MS-Windows expert where I am not, and that's good enough.