From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 1e3b0f2: Improve doc strings of project.el Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:49:59 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87bllfqj82.fsf@warpmail.net> <83o8pfxhzq.fsf@gnu.org> <83imfnxgt3.fsf@gnu.org> <73f90d2e-b754-93e0-4caa-5f86601edd98@yandex.ru> <83ftarxf58.fsf@gnu.org> <27b37b2d-c509-b5fb-c633-fc9dd60dc184@yandex.ru> <83366qyjxo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="96133"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 Cc: philip@warpmail.net, theo@thornhill.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 19 20:50:37 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jmM61-000OvA-Hh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 20:50:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmM60-0007vQ-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmM5U-0007Sr-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]:45668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jmM5S-00053R-Vx; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id o15so11188102ejm.12; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:50:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xfyOARs25KnoXjIi+5J8PRlHIoc2+4KFEpgJY/u8qg8=; b=I6lYMLuGxZB14v99qqnVxaJEEyCweUXHrMYIw8NH5gkokBAUpPjoRm2x/RyNy5mRTJ hpqx1vJURxglIbunvPpqqh7BO+u7XkblAS4OGotg4eeisUDlFOQEQ7BawJ5k9Va6aFTt B4HEaByjSV1Ki8psMone/WFMWy1UaIx3AM0B5kcY3jFq3pZ8k+5CxJeuuubQJ+7Ithz4 7DebGmvbsm9GVSLpJj5Iws5pnM5stA+svKmIaT6wSYfASYQ8SN66GhxKtMF8p65vN6t2 3wtatKlA8CY2k+PK39TYVw7CoRUPzc1wqA6vMrlsYlyIHiN6Zoac+qfLh2kxjjZe8NE7 pvYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xfyOARs25KnoXjIi+5J8PRlHIoc2+4KFEpgJY/u8qg8=; b=dgawSK847CmlqL5jqLX8GnDFtnu6lj5rrOGal6VhkrI1pKTu7cpDeTFKLJb2OoehQv IGhRcpDQvgWNq2UVj2FldoA2tmBg0hVUQNGTsFjKFnWriCVm9/WgOfMUiL4o1WSKVVER wTk2R6Ua8BCJ1vsltgyX2v87NlGjpO3noscyxiRnYdVwktQithiK5TQzCMCk3I9KR8fH /B6odu64qmbjoDFLfCQARmR7DGOfTeLgbcsSFOqDdCEnAXUtvOTtktEbD0j6A3Mr0q8Q Oa2T4jU3sKVy1jxfSQjdw8LyP4teC+4bW9x7U/cH6UiU0Inf8YtaAQI6lmBakPzh4ODm dLLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532M6HPZwQieRtrQdN7R9xVaX446b6eE9VRFnOo4hv6OJV/SZgB9 Plsdp7+7lIBonyfjnB7T8y78i4FY X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwi417uhxar2y8TQzQOW5AFqKGcp2uLNEGWgGreRQlaVKNb0SBEbkrxJylLbr3AVUWKC0UXAA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5283:: with SMTP id c3mr4677717ejm.22.1592592601058; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id bo26sm5403349edb.67.2020.06.19.11.49.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:50:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83366qyjxo.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252402 Archived-At: On 19.06.2020 21:44, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> It's not the worst idea, but the set of "buffers belonging to the >>>> current project" should probably be the same between >>>> project-switch-to-buffer and project-kill-buffers. >>> No, not necessarily. The purpose of the commands is different, so >>> they could start with the same basic list, but apply different filters >>> to it. >> There can be subtle differences (e.g. ones stemming from >> project-kill-buffers-skip-conditions), but the general notion of what it >> mean to have a buffer belong to a project should be generally the same. > "Generally", yes. But your objection above was based on the premise > that they are identical. If they are similar, then there's no > problem. If we agree on that, then we probably agree that the docstrings of those functions should also be similar to a certain degree.