From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Fran Litterio" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch to fix frame positioning with negative top/left values onWindows Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:23:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144027437 17910 80.91.229.2 (3 Apr 2006 01:23:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 01:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 03 03:23:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQDnK-0002UW-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:23:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQDnK-0006AR-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:23:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FQDn9-0006AM-3a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:23:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FQDn7-0006A6-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:23:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQDn7-0006A3-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.190] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FQDq4-0003Fh-KI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:26:40 -0400 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l36so503172nfa for ; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:23:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fUtfaEag3LxS0MW0dV1IBgP9yFF6uFvlut7nTzc3s6XZMfPzba0mItDVJDmWeO5M/U68A85SkPBjarp3HhPWrzxVL0AE/DwyTUe5f1raQmoBy9ISYSh/MJJ7HnRJakaU9sWG96QRQRLS5ICpcLmuQitVUO9s6mD6Amj5S7NIMac= Original-Received: by 10.48.219.8 with SMTP id r8mr194400nfg; Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:23:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.49.23.5 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Apr 2006 18:23:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52341 Archived-At: On 4/2/06, Richard Stallman wrote: > I just checked the CVS archive, and my patch has not been applied. > I've been running with it for well over a year with no negative > side-effects. I would like to see it applied. > > Is this the change that we just had a discussion about? > Or is this a different one? It's a different one. This one fixes improper frame positioning on Windows when negative X or Y offsets are supplied. It fixes a bug where passing the value -1 would not position the edge of the window decorations exactly at the right or bottom of the screen. -- Francis Litterio