From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#5541: 23.1; after upgrading to emacs-23, meta key in xterm no longer works Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:05:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873a04ysew.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <876350rmmx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268593586 27652 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2010 19:06:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jim Paris , emacs-devel@gnu.org, 5541@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 14 20:06:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nqt8Z-0003yw-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:06:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nqt8Y-00012U-6k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nqt8S-00012M-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:06:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42188 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nqt8R-00012E-Gx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nqt8Q-0002IM-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57612) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nqt8Q-0002II-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nqt8N-0004Zg-Mm; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:05:55 -0400 X-Spook: oil Taiwan industrial intelligence BLU-97 A/B Ft. Meade X-Ran: e2cTmM(9DgA_IFu;g={H%Kn@Wg`Hh{!;d5JMR[\U%/fmE/$.#K~yotQbh;G~s2X_a'$4WA X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <876350rmmx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Sat\, 13 Mar 2010 15\:29\:26 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121962 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: > And does xterm-24* behave OK? I don't have that version. My system just updated to xterm-255, and it behaves the same as 253 did. Running `xrdb -remove' first makes no difference.