From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Konstantin Kharlamov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? WAS: Re: Making Emacs more friendly to newcomers Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:00:10 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87k12bdgx7.fsf@yahoo.com> <87r1wi7a8o.fsf@yahoo.com> <875zdteybt.fsf@runbox.com> <87368wrvf5.fsf@yahoo.com> <86k126d83n.wl-me@enzu.ru> <83pnbyckvv.fsf@gnu.org> <4923d7e98f5ed816a7569093dbc673153adcea88.camel@yandex.ru> <87tuzezrrl.fsf@tcd.ie> <7e47e9a4ccb739fbd0179d2b8ae3b7b48d19e316.camel@yandex.ru> <87h7ve7lox.fsf@tcd.ie> <22650dc349758df4b0c05269c407ecade6a24181.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="91131"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , Stefan Kangas , Dmitry Gutov To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 13 23:01:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jkDHG-000Nab-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 23:01:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36312 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkDHF-0006wa-Ak for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkDGR-0006OR-Cc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from forward100p.mail.yandex.net ([77.88.28.100]:34947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jkDGO-0003hi-Kl; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mxback8j.mail.yandex.net (mxback8j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1619::111]) by forward100p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 779805981616; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:00:12 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from iva5-057a0d1fbbd8.qloud-c.yandex.net (iva5-057a0d1fbbd8.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0c:7f1c:0:640:57a:d1f]) by mxback8j.mail.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id oZzkfGd8s9-0CWqQ5lg; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:00:12 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1592082012; bh=kZUTIS59LPOIfw48Dk3j4dE2CnY0bhrohIMQZctS/2w=; h=In-Reply-To:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:References:Date; b=ZSOFVyDDXgmIM3oGqXk/KLUcsmEG7jZ4uFAk5/mosmCa631EV+dv4qvsn939MRMQ+ a43rTzBmMkW/yLMegCPxINseQ2/ZPEbSDNTa5124lLCK+xfjU0336RIvohLBpFWcXf gOMJGVfP7cA8iBEXhp0ATdn3du3WK3+cxMiaR9a4= Authentication-Results: mxback8j.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Original-Received: by iva5-057a0d1fbbd8.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id ZnbvqBcJRy-0BV06anE; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:00:11 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) In-Reply-To: <22650dc349758df4b0c05269c407ecade6a24181.camel@yandex.ru> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=77.88.28.100; envelope-from=hi-angel@yandex.ru; helo=forward100p.mail.yandex.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/13 17:00:13 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252209 Archived-At: Sorry, typos On Sat, 2020-06-13 at 23:52 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > I feel there's some misunderstanding. The list our discussion is about only > mentions changed functions/variables. *"mentions of changed functions/variables" > > You didn't exactly. It is possible to take shortcuts depending on the > > context. See the file CONTRIBUTE or (info "(standards) Change Logs") > > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html. > > Oh, okay, so I read the docs, and apparently this "all callers are changed" > can > only be used when you use a calling convention. *"change a calling convention", sorry