From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Axelsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scrolling up at the end of the buffer Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:06:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <436409D3.6040703@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2086348932==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130944182 25596 80.91.229.2 (2 Nov 2005 15:09:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 02 16:09:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXKCh-0001Hd-2X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:07:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXKCg-0003mK-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXKCO-0003in-N3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EXKCN-0003gx-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EXKCN-0003gq-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:06:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.82.202] (helo=xproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EXKCN-0001ZJ-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:06:47 -0500 Original-Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t9so239285wxc for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 07:06:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=GN7OVNuxw90xCHuhyMR2pwlo0XlsZ1n3YYvYyfNiPgFOY1jesFZKLE5wxjaPAetZp/WKoF1s8WBwMltTPd+tq3fF6nSSjmHLwVJZDkauLcX46QrVScnzVirdmKdmurqxwL4o9bHME8DwpQYQXLdA+lwu1yg4KakcAMW5LVlDz90= Original-Received: by 10.64.185.7 with SMTP id i7mr1912792qbf; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 07:06:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.65.230.3 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:06:44 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Mathias Dahl In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45300 Archived-At: --===============2086348932== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2291_19637749.1130944004422" ------=_Part_2291_19637749.1130944004422 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 02/11/05, Mathias Dahl wrote: > > Lennart Borgman writes: > > > Scrolling up at the end of a buffer moves the last line up from the > > bottom of the screen. It does not seem useful for me. Is this a bug? > > This happens if I use for example `scroll-up'. > > I don't understand this. Just now I put the cursor on the last line in > a buffer and pressed C-v (scroll-up) and I only got the "End of > buffer" message. > Presumably the OP means that the last line is scrolled all the way to the top of the screen, instead of staying at the bottom of the screen. It seems that both behaviours are equally common in different editors. Personally I prefer to have the last line stay at the bottom of the screen, but it is no big deal. -- Sven Axelsson ------=_Part_2291_19637749.1130944004422 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 02/11/05, Mathias Dahl <brakjoller@gmail.com> wrote:
Lennart Borgman <le= nnart.borgman.073@student.lu.se> writes:

> Scrolling up at= the end of a buffer moves the last line up from the
> bottom of the = screen. It does not seem useful for me. Is this a bug?
> This happens if I use for example `scroll-up'.

I don't unde= rstand this. Just now I put the cursor on the last line in
a buffer and = pressed C-v (scroll-up) and I only got the "End of
buffer" mes= sage.

Presumably the OP means that the l= ast line is scrolled all the way to the top of the screen, instead of stayi= ng at the bottom of the screen. It seems that both behaviours are equally c= ommon in different editors. Personally I prefer to have the last line stay = at the bottom of the screen, but it is no big deal.

--
Sven Axelsson ------=_Part_2291_19637749.1130944004422-- --===============2086348932== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel --===============2086348932==--