From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Ipswich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Screen 5.0.0 and Emacs italics bug? Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 16:31:36 +0000 Message-ID: <_jRODsMDuF2O7B0nHC6YQbVSx9SktZSEn10CcZ4I5Q_r4kIKWMJtmHu1geszSTgyhvQbUdurxOFZh_7IrAC-ZTmZ3T13D59ImPX1Gw8ci_E=@proton.me> References: <-pGdyn8-o_2NtmkusjOSlJlC5GkSXcavyH6bhDYgXNpdi_K_T3RA38RZXOfeXOlQwyP1pj849YnptsGlWVX3LY8Ev8Ni1Ayrx88Ii4l9jNc=@proton.me> <86plpk7wku.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 03 18:32:35 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1slWSJ-0009UD-7F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 18:32:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slWRf-0003T9-Pl; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:31:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slWRa-00031B-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:31:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-4027.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slWRU-00068S-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2024 12:31:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1725381101; x=1725640301; bh=1aX4l9g2o23xsgDNlurSLmpFBHKb8/XQsdLvN712PfI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=ggYSXgzE2L89oLoPG8moQ5x9AyNlXBlCkZoqOcYZjWEn5zp+oLJxemVXQcvD9zGp6 b3CcODLBXd4Pym8V72ijtclufP4sI5kjjGIoEKoPzQzjZbKWspWBxaD3+Yc0qqI+zQ mSUFuM10zC+9y5EgMCSu3aCvUd63lfcxe+iWO7NCt9uRiIagQSEGuIwz6BV1zEUl2P DOaq+TRSejRGnkzGYUXfUFSDaZb7WVTYPwVS8NpaVi8sD5fLb2OHGvNrgOxNetajiZ /Ydlj+G2N+YNRgnK5I5R1kaQx2s4nQcwOSkiqUtQygJVNtsgZC3364Fz28FxGJ8jL0 qFfHLq68rNAkg== In-Reply-To: <86plpk7wku.fsf@gnu.org> Feedback-ID: 65072663:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: bfeba7363c2c4765fa39568f3b985bc5734bd71d Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.27; envelope-from=james.ipswich@proton.me; helo=mail-4027.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:323334 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I asked questions in the Savannah bug report, but it was left > unanswered. Does the new Screen implement the sitm and ritm > capabilities? If it does not, I'm afraid that GNU Screen is still > where it was a year ago. Thanks. Sounds correct, the maintainer did not answer those questions and the bug seems to be still present. I will open a new bug to see if this time it gets more attention by the GNU Screen maintainer. Best, J.