From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master c86995d07e9: Enable code block evaluation when generating .org manuals Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:38:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <171767737644.19678.784876979840850798@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240606123616.DE7C9C1F9EF@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87h6e6i1mg.fsf@gmail.com> <87r0d9flv4.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="204AyWg2jKFOYO1y" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27320"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kyle Meyer To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 07 08:39:23 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sFTFx-0006m6-EQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 08:39:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFTF8-0005XJ-RC; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 02:38:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFTF6-0005Wj-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 02:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFTF4-0002ZZ-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 02:38:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3OERw21xa07jZbTXHXzWjy1+bPYV3K7dINSS7jpKKCA=; b=peGv0sGzlSKv6VoLyvk4EVt1q3 faQr4b0BUbrPXC2HxrdOnYFlEBEUACF/Ra4C5imHqRciPspU3ZUybffvsXxofYoTbUWf/piPrQzYA gyIZyXHtt84QRM15EdhPh9v6AfhzUwWFaXDkoP0VejqCLaLe8y0U+g7HdpW7icyEAgiilSWuT+pUD iXDC7jieEo4SJcIgYO7LFXy3559JVz3rNdSWP3tUSov/K0v/Z5KQh4G23sd6o021eM8obFaG/YBKE 3d2zudRUVP35796rcMrHghfjHhuh6EBN91AjZYq5ISCTt+Qcx/ZkCcYKvCCOEOK4iwkWLDqQq03+j LnGe8RNQ==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFTEq-0000YA-GT; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 08:38:12 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319862 Archived-At: --204AyWg2jKFOYO1y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 01:13:56PM +0800, Po Lu wrote: > writes: [...] > This can only be true if documentation changes are scrutinized so little > that code, and by extension malicious code simply passes unnoticed. [...] > You mean to imply that Org Mode is more susceptible to organized > sabotage than other players whose code we import, such as Gnulib, or, > heaven forbid, we ourselves? That way lies madness. Not at all. I was just supporting Robert's idea of having this discussion. I don't thing he (or anyone) would propose to rule out executing "generic" code in document generation. Just that doing this implies higher awareness. Cheers --=20 t --204AyWg2jKFOYO1y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZmKqzgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RlgfAJ9Oz36DXtvOoRud+avComaPWMc1rACfSdCfk2YdJvIWqEJhTUVP8ifBt+Y= =wWL+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --204AyWg2jKFOYO1y--