From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where / when Emacs on Gitlab? Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:21:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a5pbw2ly.fsf@dataswamp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="D2cFr6/KJJe3FGZd" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 12 08:22:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBs1-0009GG-Qy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:22:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBrN-0001JU-Vg; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:21:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBrK-0001JL-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:21:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBrG-0006P4-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 02:21:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DFSlOj4UakLYshmwF6BMU4/On1c88RNxDNmNcAtSmdw=; b=MxwWjDUc8isSN62yxvqnRNLNew 1xuqZ+h4ZvVL8CEc0Q03nmMzs/QF1RFTVpXT9fK6i/ohUS6aIFe1EBnhm40T79DJMzquDslEZAfAP t89hnt5c2BAbcFPXLsaA56VLifFhOpE1rD3BCX8IzTBcDqwNR9AjvCecYSRvsXKKc2FZW/oWnSGMu 13hrNTilBWuziyWnDXeKLI7vLnMNGAWElT7nuOccwfR6e20LSmohxoLptO/3I7jckhv9125jHwSB1 BOds3xXn+6ks+8BaYFHJ3tPdEW3UCwVvkYf3n4ZrppCSKxBNx5dq+C9OxQIy+nKa1C7PmHRZYky8f 5Xv7zqSg==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOBrD-0005fQ-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 08:21:35 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a5pbw2ly.fsf@dataswamp.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314889 Archived-At: --D2cFr6/KJJe3FGZd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 06:19:05AM +0100, Emanuel Berg wrote: > tomas wrote: >=20 > > In other words: you seem to be convinced that Yor Way is the > > Right Way. Nothing wrong with that. But you don't seem > > willing to listen to others why they think Their Way seems > > the Right Way for them. >=20 > Optimally one would have systems that are interface-agnostic > to the point everyone could use whatever they wanted to > access the same thing. This is an interesting idea; in practice, it is more difficult than expected. I've observed that several times: the "medium" (presentation, whatever) does influence communication style and patterns, and you "feel" bumps at medium boundaries. I've seen that with a mail capable forum (Discourse), which I've been taking part for five years. Heck, I've seen that with plain old mail, using mutt and immersed in an Outlook environment. It'll take a lot of thought and design to overcome that. I even think that the very thought of "media agnostic" will be a challenge to most users ("this red thingy on the upper right"). Nevertheless, I'm interested in ideas/papers/thoughts on it, Cheers --=20 t --D2cFr6/KJJe3FGZd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZaDoeQAKCRAFyCz1etHa RkchAJ9yi+A5zMXxnhiDbYrnmn4QzTi6VwCfY8kqqdS4gkqErd9jGBawuk18Iiw= =DqSS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --D2cFr6/KJJe3FGZd--