From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where / when Emacs on Gitlab? Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DxQt0iQU/46xTFWm" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35773"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers To: Psionic K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 08:52:17 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNprN-00095E-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:52:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNpqQ-0006eP-SG; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 02:51:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNpqP-0006dx-16 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 02:51:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNpqM-00034a-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 02:51:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=i2i8v6De0tUQ1tiu9UAs31t+3mqKr1g4x3Xey6Cc8dg=; b=N5FJAqg1ifizY0RV20Ur00/f66 4kBehscwYq12ZsdLImK1X//aqfof2pHHWTKe9vt2F89rCEEctxTdsAXd/yGccNzPO8zpDn0uJYfcz tPwVWUYVidRWK/cuL8XauqA50n+meAU7hjkGi0JT8w9gnQn2Xtaa5JXNhXlPoaPXhqxeG7Bir0T3l 2ZkGpo/DrpElFClBy4y/rx21+0pTLx0vMbhLSRh/Qj0Qnh0Z6OSCvdOr0MbPTmGyW7kKzjTRHP/jU oWRbhJLYBeKGxXmiZZE5Uxvxj+do6rgweo2K6VL1ZwhCdBX3RIXwfnFHbpDB4IlCfq/P6kU6/9XPF NTf1nf9Q==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNpqJ-0000sN-1V; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:51:11 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314840 Archived-At: --DxQt0iQU/46xTFWm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 03:22:12PM +0900, Psionic K wrote: > I only just caught Stefan's presentation on Emacs development > https://toobnix.org/w/m4XmrmE9Geat54AKT1RQaH [...] > While these web 2.0 style services have their own drawbacks for > communication that have become more clear in their 20 years of > evolution, the better systems are currently under development and we > should direct attention toward making better things rather than > applying friction to each other over the drawbacks of these soon-to-be > ancient web 2.0 platforms [...] You align things along a "worse...better" line, but let me say that this valuation corresponds to your opinion, which I do respect but I don't share at all. For me, a good mail workflow is way better than any of the Web 2.0 alternatives available (and yes, I do have experience with Gitlab). Cheers --=20 t --DxQt0iQU/46xTFWm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZZ+d6AAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rnj8AJ4vr49TkRCd7wohBewABLSK8W6VvACdFaH5VTlziyfh5T+0oxmsBXyIU5c= =TOnM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DxQt0iQU/46xTFWm--