From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter maturity Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <0883EB00-3BB2-4BC8-95D1-45F4497C0526@dancol.org> <87plldrx6a.fsf@posteo.net> <87ikr5rwx0.fsf@posteo.net> <86ed1rq6gc.fsf@gnu.org> <73737665-984E-4C97-9183-7805C1BCB550@dancol.org> <86bjwuricz.fsf@gnu.org> <5D1AB17D-8847-42ED-B246-8DB4D11F7FB7@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Brrv3VOUXbYfxDLy" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11026"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 29 11:14:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tRqJ7-0002jU-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:14:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRqIK-0008NK-H5; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 05:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRqIF-0008NA-6Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 05:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tRqID-0000Pi-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 05:13:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wCclakM7+2f3BMK22HbOqA4navs+ad9xEM9bLNX0ohM=; b=O2QwyckvGtNiG90aGHjfi5oPe3 9cbpG3YMie9P9l8eu7hZkFSE+3K0NaCUwlMhdkIT8iLyLSqrJPq5M4KyXFgxhWhp3vUsfX1V5Wktu 7KqJWg8TeGZTEE/0sewkbo4c7U+0oarC8zgIJr9KXwFSDPtrUXXLoI9y524+6ibmWYmfS7xlrlyfz 9qJcVxwPca9DwJUlKeiKY8tof4EZmncvdtjzyS2aWANe0rszt3CXt4d1lmTTQRS1m8LZwo5BGqePk Xrm0m0wdyRW0feYAHTMUyvEsr2j1R5PmoAPKEnhJGg0kg122MbcmvgdJKxTXK5zO+9Qnr15MHqoPV JO06j1aw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tRqIA-0007Xk-14 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:13:02 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327328 Archived-At: --Brrv3VOUXbYfxDLy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 04:14:37AM -0500, Daniel Colascione wrote: [...] > The grammars don't make any backwards compatibility guarantees. There hav= e been multiple Emacs bugs arising from grammars unilaterally changing term= inal names and such. ISTM the only way to guarantee compatibility is to ven= dor the whole stack. Since you asked in another thread: you just gave me another strong reason to steer clear of TS. Cheers --=20 t --Brrv3VOUXbYfxDLy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZ3EgpgAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rop4AJ9aWZBuScN4egDiwMFApE+dIdMZkwCcC9aiyzOB0+/rmgKqtu8+4sco5NU= =M0Fr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Brrv3VOUXbYfxDLy--