From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default Info face Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:22:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87wmfxgvjd.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oK+/uBuHTcizafa+" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16905"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 18 11:23:20 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tNrD6-0004G1-D2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:23:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNrCG-0002Ct-FQ; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 05:22:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNrCE-0002CX-Bh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 05:22:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tNrC9-0007oJ-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 05:22:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3Wa7n0MsLD5t1Oc2fJdMOEsh++msoWNAogMn/YoBcUo=; b=s9vnE641r+FKgilnHRzCnp4ZQJ iNnEia8hS6wuROHv/z2VYlxcytVjFzYJClMXEytYllTIlKbvjfG1/QwvIiiAvXi1KeRxsMQke9LLV o9V/LxfMGHMo1f4DLUSgss0v4LAqNCcQBGS+n8IXyj5Lp/qeZolFWnhlxno3BKnFspFW+WjdvmLY1 KDeQinFDVY8UcwfXYLZzsMolqsowe68/H45q4Gg0zlBIXnTew10gi33Egxoku6JXC4fk0nI3A7PRT P6pl/9yZQfJKTvzb3wBShV6uotdXN1sXgGg4tMOzwr7ISPmuuMSL1pc0aK7r/8gtbn6HvLmpSE4uE U5Kz/V7A==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tNrC5-0003Ph-Bm; Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:22:17 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wmfxgvjd.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326639 Archived-At: --oK+/uBuHTcizafa+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:00:54AM +0100, Manuel Giraud via Emacs developme= nt discussions. wrote: > Hi, >=20 > If I'm not mistaken, currently, the face used for the text body of Info > nodes is `default'. I was wondering if there would be any interest in > having an `info' face defined for this usage. I imagine that it could > inherit for `variable-pitch-text' as "shr.el" is doing. I also guess > that it would have an impact on some sub-faces (like `info-title*' for > example). WDYT? As long as I can define variable-pitch to be a fixed-pitch font ;-P More seriously: I explicitly set as much as I can to be a fixed pitch font. It works best with my combo of screen and sight. I think it's a bad idea to encode a font property into a base font's name. It feels like forcing others to swallow one's own esthetic preferences. Thanks & cheers --=20 t --oK+/uBuHTcizafa+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCZ2KiUgAKCRAFyCz1etHa RuPCAJ0dI6SYEwKh4TuZD5s6UMjoEVBhHACfSqwjefLd9/81tQTw/umzUWmv4d4= =vCxY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oK+/uBuHTcizafa+--