From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Persistent failure to lookup hostname Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87lepw4fyz.fsf@gnus.org> <87tu4k9gz2.fsf@gmail.com> <87pmf89brz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8VSe1TLsdMEZ8SEw" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37710"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 11:42:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ofeRJ-0009eN-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:42:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36916 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofeRI-0008FY-F5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 05:42:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofePI-0006i8-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 05:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:43754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ofePF-0006F8-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 05:40:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pSatwHpFYKzVx35gELe+v+fLKX4N3fH9QrAgTROsZvU=; b=Dfj1c3bYdMuL6bc47WSSGIIYPd Lp7WnXd6klcV83rxve6rprwz19l6eQC4L9vKYi8mUQr+5KPvukqMtf0F17SUa4ASz9GRO+TujFlYy q++ZOCadrEDRSw5898AtSVn+6g+QmYToVwaA8wVMk1cWAt8gW1uo8ibB1Dj2JwaQ3yEsMlGcfhwAt EkTFo42ry9tvIlJBHGMbJAu1gmFufrU81hbmaq15xDkFc9d7iRSCKPmm/Ho4DAVEHOub9sm6aFDA/ k2Y1dvX+jC/JB/GrDjSlg5rHqB1cTW1nNfR2mbqR8zH8dgTwiaYBTOTo0+ukQlOzwxCFXKxcpbTzF +54iOJvA==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ofePC-0001Ou-L8; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 11:40:02 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pmf89brz.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296869 Archived-At: --8VSe1TLsdMEZ8SEw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 11:30:08AM +0200, Robert Pluim wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:05:29 +0200, said: >=20 > tomas> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:37:53AM +0200, Robert Pluim wrote: > >> sudo tcpdump -i any -n udp and port 53 >=20 > tomas> "Out of Emacs" can mean different things :) [...] > Yes, and then there is dnsmasq, and the upstream DSL 'router=CA=BC might = be > caching DNS, etc etc. Checking the network traffix just helps in > finding out who to blame :-) You would see the latter with tcpdump (make sure to include local interfaces to catch dnsmasq). But you wouldn't catch nscd (no network traffic) and possibly not systemd-resolved or how it's called. Cheers --=20 t --8VSe1TLsdMEZ8SEw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYzv/awAKCRAFyCz1etHa RrLTAJ95cn6eRrq7iSdLC0ym7czzJMc6vwCdEJKJQqebMdIe2n5eZhAK+J2GsOA= =vygM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8VSe1TLsdMEZ8SEw--