From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term) Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 17:54:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <8335c9dkyf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tu4odez7.fsf@gnu.org> <871qrrpkgx.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <834jwnbi6c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtafnun5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org> <83czbaafnj.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P21hX75PARgKWKMg" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21941"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 17:56:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1of1K2-0005ZF-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:56:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1K2-0008RD-2H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:56:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1Iq-0006QW-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:44748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1Io-0000mt-LU; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:54:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UUdwY6akkuKjiScLeyZIJR+yqjL/iNWGsiQRFtJREgo=; b=PNnWwaVI4lS91K+aPT4liLRCBZ G1nxZrC/aIedtuW37iAlOHMfnfwP3Rpa6Gggpzyd0wMzgByY0peDRukgOCIoHbXIg8FtJkL9IwWOw Nby/Ld3pQ02TWb1NbF3iNilLmEP4GqpyNn7hdc8syqXDq56BX6N5Um91zRDRzTsamJe6KCtYWOur9 qXP2wADmq6h5Jsb0uWKg3Iq0u2KPiP3E7FsP5muF1t+NGtP3D1vGi0/LE6zPl5Ij2oJKpcL3LICSc xX8wyVLSsyB3zhH0bvrH4x3RcXnsLaIETJsJmNgCLBUDBTEGnHeZKrTO5ZhTrL3SxMidkDdAEs5I8 iukEJkSw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1of1Ii-00031n-3O; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 17:54:44 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83czbaafnj.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296629 Archived-At: --P21hX75PARgKWKMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 09:44:16AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 08:10:15 +0200 > > From: [...] > > But installing a binary pacage on a system does modify the system > > for all users, so admin powers do make sense there. >=20 > What do you mean by "binary package" in this context? I believe > "package" in this discussion generally alludes to Lisp packages, from > ELPA and elsewhere. They aren't "binary" in my book. Ah, I see. I was too sloppy. I was talking about Debian packages. Sorry for the confusion. Cheers --=20 tom=C3=A1s --P21hX75PARgKWKMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYzm0RAAKCRAFyCz1etHa Rpi/AJ41Tzezen0J2+pW830bm4zkwZbjggCfVkLZyEnjT+EvYKulH7pMhTAPC68= =icTK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P21hX75PARgKWKMg--