From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Convert README.org to plain text README while installing package Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:13:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83sfoaurqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu8mv79u.fsf@localhost> <83czfart19.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8szrfz6.fsf@localhost> <83ilozpzce.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnde1rqh.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6aa2oty.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmj63qs0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1F4MO9Mf+BjMh6H7" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11734"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 18 19:14:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o2c1i-0002qQ-Q8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:14:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2c1h-0003zY-Db for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:14:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2c12-0003GN-4t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:52462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o2c10-0007yw-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:13:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PNEIXvVs/6YTJK0Y8eiFf8hrx8wlIExW52qBNJoZSTM=; b=qeXmaSBWmwd/SBhKbNiL+aPCuQ 6ejQOfW279URQdwIjTBjSHbiA/pOjX8aTmB/cjtnX3d0F/neRuX8uhSzc5mVgZ+q5FvyPFIDRVEDp 9rhIQlzo7WzHXmVf+9B5PyMDfCMiqNuuNVOiQjrx4BtwB586G+7FGHN6wRY4XD35Dzeb4gvtN/JB7 PqJI7+TkTjUrwT6JsmeAqRoRM71gLzM6bP1L59giBzPAth33Jphnn9Bt+V57xRywRyeAPea8gHpMY SuCqBeVh0rf4zWWL3PLtWBV3DX9Vm9KHyy1LNY85uEQ2uNDVq59nROItAHpe7pz55iGNyeoNqa8ba aNApLe1g==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1o2c0x-0000XX-3v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:13:39 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pmj63qs0.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:291379 Archived-At: --1F4MO9Mf+BjMh6H7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 09:30:47PM +0530, Visuwesh wrote: > [=E0=AE=9A=E0=AE=A9=E0=AE=BF =E0=AE=9C=E0=AF=82=E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D 18, 202= 2 17:50] tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > > But I can totally understand that some people don't like it. What > > to do? > > >=20 > I find it jarring when people throw in the very verbose org format for > source blocks. Other org syntax is just fine IMO. How would you delimit a source block? Perhaps there are some ideas for the Org folks (I'm a happy user, no more :) Cheers --=20 t --1F4MO9Mf+BjMh6H7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYq4HvAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RlEgAJ9F+AlVIhcfoLRJvkreHS0tD1ovrgCfUV2QS8yVGlsLhlvb68aAoD/PeN0= =rskr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1F4MO9Mf+BjMh6H7--