From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What's happened to M- `completion-at-point'? Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 07:03:58 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83bkwd4xle.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfpp2qvy.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1592km7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oQAhCcBmp5KfjhM0" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2199"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 05 07:05:34 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nmTgE-0000Nk-96 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 07:05:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45430 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmTgC-0005VV-Gq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 01:05:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmTem-0004aR-4P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 01:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:59536) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nmTek-0001So-CU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 01:04:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BpoVO7tEJuvCb0TDbI1RamW4a8XnbIgr89a2jLiv0dM=; b=mHLP0Dr5Bdk4/t7RKjQ0r8+F6V 7t4s3auSAtdTkXqv9jPx+DxnMb9WO8uw9edeJwNyo7aw4PYu2IgFPSdPirmVLomTYSKjNYB0N0Zub Mm6It6eozigQMGCeRDZ5loq0QYUnbGl+bKz9CNyZb5cOIn1neoWYRWsjT32bs2A7XxBj+zaiLGnWm 4MnwkwKidq0oarRKISKo+rYUoEEJEAmYvyXeGKm6Pf/y9ftrfTuj9NRYB1CzLlyQkU/9ldwMlEPeh WKKOW1IEnLJYvE4ovAVnVSJS0whyMXz+2+T0iVnVl/ISVPVXPD3y8z/RnAhZ0EeJKHbcPcn0/d5Um OKmQY6/A==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nmTeg-0002HR-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2022 07:03:58 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289223 Archived-At: --oQAhCcBmp5KfjhM0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 09:07:04PM +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Yuri. >=20 > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 03:31:24 +0700, Yuri Khan wrote: > > On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 03:16, Stefan Monnier = wrote: >=20 > > > AFAIK the `backtab` is usually used for `S-tab` rather than `M-tab`. > > > What do you get if you hit the TAB key together with the Shift modifi= er? > > > Does Emacs also receive the ESC TAB byte sequence in that (and then m= aps > > > it back (correctly this time) to `backtab`)? >=20 > > On my Ubuntu 22.04 with Linux 5.15.0, in tty, both Shift+Tab and > > Alt+Tab produce an ESC TAB sequence. So probably the problem on the > > ncurses/terminfo side is induced by a problem on the Linux side. >=20 > I don't think this is actually the case. If you look at the keyboard > mapping file in the kernel: >=20 > /usr/src/linux-5.15.32/drivers/tty/vt/defkeymap.map >=20 > , the entry for key 15, the tab key, looks like this: >=20 > ######################################################################### > keycode 15 =3D Tab Tab > alt keycode 15 =3D Meta_Tab > ######################################################################### I can confirm here that alt-tab and shift-tab both translate to esc+tab. Only the Linux console, bash cat and hexdump -C were involved. Debian buster, Linux kernel 5.10.0-14-amd64. Cheers --=20 t --oQAhCcBmp5KfjhM0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYnNatwAKCRAFyCz1etHa RsjYAJ9VtNEirn7bSdbgbRMhJNvyWsPKKQCfc8OFQfi4TX9lxKpgG07/a4dneDo= =gJJ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oQAhCcBmp5KfjhM0--