From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: could matlab-mode be in ELPA or the GNU emacs tree (like auctex and org-mode)? Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:51:35 +0300 Message-ID: References: <878rxiu323.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87r1b8y66l.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18539"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.0 (2022-02-12) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 12:58:30 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nJZzx-0004bu-BY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:58:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJZzw-000377-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 06:58:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJZwG-0008KJ-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 06:54:40 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:44967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nJZwE-0004id-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 06:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.75.189.127]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000067F47.00000000620A42FB.00006C72; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:54:35 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286248 Archived-At: * Stefan Monnier [2021-11-22 17:01]: > > Ok, thanks for the clarification RMS. > > Anybody else: is this settled, then? > > If Richard is OK with it, it's good enough for me. Why is then NonGNU ELPA included, but to avoid packages made solely to interact with proprietary software. If Richard is OK with including such packages, he may be so. I am surprised, but I follow free software principles by RMS, not his individual reasoning, which I find in this case incorrect. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/