From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Default custom file was: Re: Propose to add setup-wizard.el to ELPA Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 15:28:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87a6g8yql2.fsf@yahoo.com> <87lezrvyfx.fsf@yahoo.com> <878rvqwosg.fsf@yahoo.com> <874k6ewkb4.fsf@yahoo.com> <87zgo6v1ll.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="efe2SSf21snXr9HM" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29545"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 15:29:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Cj9-0007Se-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 15:29:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Cj7-0000Ai-NX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:29:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Chw-0007t1-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:28:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:36142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Chv-0004Rt-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 09:28:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Uj+gF+WynTg+7XSzp9/3O3DARqIpQtixyDKA2ziAqZ4=; b=ugsg2fzuWs/8YLtmLmUZfTn6vn txAUNtuDRsfzxCcCGLWzfcvo9WanI8tkwjKGGh4CcY7keUrfqsO28ldrRpfRZ1lOtM+oMkVFAuvYL u5xTwleiuNqwWDl4JPYMK12H8pmbSscLnmKEixNsjzWjDuOiBnAh5OmO3nOweJZPrxSpLogqlQxMu CLr1dlfdLEjm2VLaVSh+EGYFKUM+uG6TsSsjQQl20QyjsONoVTfLGCE2P9qYALyB21muoQlLk1vzp FzAjb+KbvUTbUydJUejSGARhUTY1+Fqmzv4Rf5Kpm1383k9G0SZQTjRT9MyiXs02TqY3mQyPLz/sA qjsTnAyw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Chr-0007t0-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 15:28:31 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:284467 Archived-At: --efe2SSf21snXr9HM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:59:37PM +0100, xenodasein--- via Emacs developme= nt discussions. wrote: > Jan 8, 2022, 15:44 by luangruo@yahoo.com: >=20 > > xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." > > writes: > > > >> Not changing an established default can be a sign of stagnation. > >> > > > > That statement is wrong. > > >=20 > Above statement is wrong. Let's agree on "both statements can be wrong"? I think xenodasein's characterization sufficiently careful in this case: "can be a sign of...". That means that it isn't a sure sign. More evidence would be necessary to reach a clear conclusion. We seem to agree, after all? Peace :-) Cheers --=20 t --efe2SSf21snXr9HM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYdmfhwAKCRAFyCz1etHa Ri2qAJ9gvERWxY+Q0OMHLkCddsZTktZ6WQCfYWuEKZurhKE4BGED4J1LHH8MVxk= =NiQ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --efe2SSf21snXr9HM--