From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contradictiory directions Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:59:14 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k0g6mivu.fsf@gnus.org> <87y24ms4jj.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsqumi16.fsf@gnus.org> <87tufas40e.fsf@yahoo.com> <877dc6mhjc.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmpys3gv.fsf@yahoo.com> <8735mumgyy.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf0ms2to.fsf@yahoo.com> <875yrqrydx.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfxtokN6tm/gjIAu" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28694"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 11:01:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mxR65-0007H4-6P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 11:01:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxR63-0005qX-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 05:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxR4B-00012P-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:35302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mxR49-0005qk-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:59:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject :Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VB8lof1/+gvwNHT87TyEPt7GY3Igm5lYnn15maan+QY=; b=hmz0TqIFGyYGJtnzS6KjVGDRDG kQ3kEvlx7GEZ4fcbMPJEA6bJ3dtTUY6LnpFreVSLOOMXxLOC9LldWme7LGejtprFAJ0e4sqjlUzPX bcOw+BuXseCG0PjGJxnWJrsV2+DbAKOKnMQNJDtYd2QAhRomk08f02monQZWF+K2Ps1ZnhscRGXzf +MoSozpQmthRZaGbXY+DsVzZ2dMbsqO+rcbztUkHAlMC0uyMvZlcO0QBDwYZDFx78HhKvcrL4+KMJ deJoErOxSuDukNDT9GvTPOZebEdn+VO2VkKMRAxwne3YKj93kGz6Jroi6aUmFGBWVGKpkTitDo7hT d/K6aUdw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mxR46-0004gW-I3; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:59:14 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875yrqrydx.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282001 Archived-At: --WfxtokN6tm/gjIAu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 05:49:30PM +0800, Po Lu wrote: Hi, this is going to be my last post to this thread. I think it isn't useful to extend those discussions beyond some point. > writes: >=20 > > This is a politically loaded discussion. Still, I think it is important. > > If there is a reason to assume that "blacklist"/"whitelist" might offend > > some people, I think it does make sense to look for alternatives. >=20 > This is not a political discussion, but one based on technical issues, [...] This "we decide exclusively on technical grounds" is usually a higly political decision hidden behind a tree. My hunch is that this is one of those cases. But, as I said above, I'll rest my case. We have stated our positions, we won't convince each other, so that's the maximum use we can expect this thread can have. Let's agree to differ. Cheers --=20 t --WfxtokN6tm/gjIAu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYbm8bAAKCRAFyCz1etHa RgqmAJ97V5SlTS6Afi9LlpU7bzSqG5G2fgCfWA4irFLgkw687fb+0xS6xIw9ejY= =BIOj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WfxtokN6tm/gjIAu--