From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sqlite3 Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 08:15:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87tufmjyai.fsf@gnus.org> <87tufhel3z.fsf@posteo.net> <87fsr12tm8.fsf@gnus.org> <87y24s4ix2.fsf@posteo.net> <87pmq3x1yr.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AyBhc/4JCu4EO5Nf" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 11 08:17:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mvwdp-0005ti-8h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 08:17:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56892 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvwdn-0005hx-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 02:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvwbp-0004Ct-8y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 02:15:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:35146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvwbj-0008RT-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 02:15:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=f7iuBNiNA7TZ2yYy6hj8d2JxD/Z+UMgRO3nOoyg7GbY=; b=QJvXd4XDhylJKvFYsOAMyZAjfA scsOtYzp2OVO/Oi+Y8JFnAxGjSnRVEFe2ufpDkluAgZ1Ble3PzfxbT+yic7A9Pb6Gdpymd7cFuDl1 XWmjHCKuH5U9g4QAif16Zgz4KTAM4RwTpE8+WkWotT1HeBHAra/sYZlBapOedQEaukl9RTTLJQLb9 JV6XKkj/OzrkQaYvHjr+88rtgEoEuux0DldQjHygwnC57AYTA81XeHUY1wP7ScXniajPnYoPaGIyY yuRk0Vki+a5SHnMkmobFDspAzs5ggWF44fZX+Geh/782zjKRevBL6At+5tt0Q0OUiQN+mBJZRdTxN kq+JeNIw==; Original-Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mvwbf-0000d2-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2021 08:15:43 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pmq3x1yr.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281656 Archived-At: --AyBhc/4JCu4EO5Nf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 04:19:40AM +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Philip Kaludercic writes: >=20 > > Yes, but do you want the persistent data interface to be bound to > > SQLite, or should a separate backed be implemented, if required? >=20 > I don't think a separate backend is necessary, but I won't stand in the > way of somebody implementing it. But you, of course, would consider it unnecessary (co-) developing an interface spec to facilitate that. > (I'm sure somebody has also > implemented a GIF decoder in Emacs Lisp because they're against using C > or something.) I can't help it: the above feels subtly... loaded. No. Not happy at all about how things are developing here, sorry to say. I don't question your intentions at all, but every time I've seen "hey, let's use $PRODUCT" at the start of some development it hasn't turned out well. I'd venture to say it is an antipattern. Cheers -- t --AyBhc/4JCu4EO5Nf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCYbRQFwAKCRAFyCz1etHa RjA/AJ42wqO2+AloD3ACG7yqRJ2U/b4xzgCfeGd/LqzTeQIQUGbSxwZuQvUY2FI= =2QiR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AyBhc/4JCu4EO5Nf--