On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 08:00:16AM -0500, dick wrote:
> PL> +  if (!keep_point_visible
> PL> +      && (!w->cursor_visible_p
> PL> +	  || w->cursor.vpos == -1)
> PL> +      && w->phys_cursor_on_p)
> 
> The display code is already rife [...]
> [...] FUD [...]

> [...]  I can't oppose it [...]

You can oppose, as anyone else. Have you considered working your tone?
Perhaps your opposition might be taken more seriously, then.

Cheers
-- 
t