From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problem with some new emoji in Emacs Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 00:14:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28803"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.7+183 (3d24855) (2021-05-28) To: Stefan Monnier , Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 22:18:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mm0Q3-0007LR-L6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 22:18:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm0Q2-0007m1-EE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:18:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm0PT-00075z-K1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:37725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mm0PS-0008FC-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 16:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.75.188.219]) (AUTH: PLAIN admin, TLS: TLS1.3,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 0000000000031EBD.0000000061902B87.000037F0; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 14:17:58 -0700 Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.170.207.13; envelope-from=bugs@gnu.support; helo=stw1.rcdrun.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279354 Archived-At: * Jean Louis [2021-11-13 23:58]: > * Stefan Monnier [2021-11-13 23:38]: > > > Here is the screen with new emoji feature: > > > https://gnu.support/files/tmp/2021-11-13/Screenshot-2021-11-13-22:33:19.png > > > > > > When I turn on the emojify-mode then I get this problem here: > > > https://gnu.support/files/tmp/2021-11-13/Screenshot-2021-11-13-22:33:36.png > > > > Does this look worse than if you use Emacs-27 to view the exact same > > text? > > I never had any problem until this new feature with emoji came. I am > trying to switch to the new built in feature. But I have problems > understanding the difference between "✔" and "✔️" as I see them > different on screen and describe-char tells me they are some, opening > file again shows me different. emojify-mode shows me error after the > second heavy check mark. I got it now, after reading the bug issue. Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/