From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: macOS metal rendering engine in mac port Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 07:23:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8365"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Aaron Jensen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 08:24:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llmxz-0001y0-U0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:24:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60014 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llmxx-0002BF-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llmx7-0001Vu-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from outbound.soverin.net ([116.202.65.218]:47937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llmx4-0005di-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 02:23:36 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0396B600D0; Wed, 26 May 2021 06:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.138]) by soverin.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=idiocy.org; s=soverin; t=1622010202; bh=Sv/uQtjefHe+qFd/ZlSm9hknybTAd2Awbb1lSM9sMt8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PQqbayYDpx1mZtCDzdITNf2RuvjLuTbgth0dC0kVDlLZWy3vGIK7eP0K9q6fQTCMr iEhGrCmif5QLGl/ualDq3bd8ot3C4c7nItBMNTApqbHdA/vHXx5sK3S9HTRwZ6MG/h XRGxvBgb7Ot/6xGsy44zDv9RgpCda1sW7sTQeczSRxjMHYC/ouOJJ8RFyFqVBeBDXN OtJf4wOe+gfl9HdJXCnFiWW6Sfp3PmGbM/QlHVqwYAbSc6VZS6Memp0fiIsmTV5Sbw 7Xb0WzsX0Sg7Zx38m4cmbN1ieBSmzGIA57+NVqXPk5Tl0hpJLweAmOmFbstG+xmdHi IB9qXPiTKLuQA== Original-Received: from alan by faroe.holly.idiocy.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1llmwp-000F98-Hc; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:23:19 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: Alan Third , Aaron Jensen , emacs-devel@gnu.org, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.65.218; envelope-from=alan@idiocy.org; helo=outbound.soverin.net X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269906 Archived-At: On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 05:32:09PM -0700, Aaron Jensen wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:31 AM Aaron Jensen wrote: > > > > I don't know if it's something funky with my machine or not but I've > > noticed some stutters with this patch. As in, it appears to miss > > paints. I'll type a character and won't see it until I type something > > else. Is it possible that this patch could cause that? > > This stopped, so maybe it was something funky. So far, today, things > feel pretty good from a latency perspective. I haven't measured > anything yet. It probably could, I've seen something similar when I was testing something or other. It will be bypassing the viewWillDraw code that forces a redisplay, but I think in theory we shouldn't need it with this code. Oh, I suppose that might break the live resizing. But we can work that out if so. -- Alan Third